Wonder what the LM lower stages condition is ??

Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the
moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion.
as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive
condition report......

just wondering what nasa expected to happen?

another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric
orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the
moon

with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers
have aged........

wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?

On Sep 30, 8:12*pm, bob haller wrote:
Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the
moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion.
as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive
condition report......

just wondering what nasa expected to happen?

another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric
orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the
moon

with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers
have aged........

wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?

According to all things NASA/Apollo, the moon is actually quite
reflective, monochromatic and otherwise totally inert. So, everything
should still be in 100% perfect condition.

On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:54:08 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 30, 8:12*pm, bob haller wrote:

Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the

moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion.

as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive

condition report......



just wondering what nasa expected to happen?



another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric

orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the

moon



with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers

have aged........



wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?



According to all things NASA/Apollo, the moon is actually quite

reflective, monochromatic and otherwise totally inert. So, everything

should still be in 100% perfect condition.

No. according to YOU, that's what NASA/Apollo is saying. The reality is otherwise but like most conspiracy nuts, your thoughts are not quite rooted in reality.

On Oct 2, 4:53*am, Dean wrote:
On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:54:08 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sep 30, 8:12*pm, bob haller wrote:

Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the

moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion.

as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive

condition report......

just wondering what nasa expected to happen?

another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric

orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the

moon

with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers

have aged........

wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?

According to all things NASA/Apollo, the moon is actually quite

reflective, monochromatic and otherwise totally inert. *So, everything

should still be in 100% perfect condition.

No. according to YOU, that's what NASA/Apollo is saying. *The reality is otherwise but like most conspiracy nuts, your thoughts are not quite rooted in reality.

Our NASA/Apollo reality is mostly subjective, because most of their
supposedly worthy forensics is missing in action, and oddly can't be
replicated by anyone because the fly-by-rocket technology of that era
simply isn't trustworthy or sufficiently documented so that others
could follow in their footsteps.

On Thursday, October 4, 2012 12:31:45 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Oct 2, 4:53*am, Dean wrote:

On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:54:08 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

On Sep 30, 8:12*pm, bob haller wrote:



Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the



moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion..



as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive



condition report......



just wondering what nasa expected to happen?



another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric



orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the



moon



with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers



have aged........



wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?



According to all things NASA/Apollo, the moon is actually quite



reflective, monochromatic and otherwise totally inert. *So, everything



should still be in 100% perfect condition.



No. according to YOU, that's what NASA/Apollo is saying. *The reality is otherwise but like most conspiracy nuts, your thoughts are not quite rooted in reality.



Our NASA/Apollo reality is mostly subjective, because most of their

supposedly worthy forensics is missing in action, and oddly can't be

replicated by anyone because the fly-by-rocket technology of that era

simply isn't trustworthy or sufficiently documented so that others

could follow in their footsteps.

Holy hell guthball, don't you spout your conspiracy theories enough already? You need to start taking your lithium. Unless that is, the government really is out to get you.

On Oct 4, 9:51*am, Dean wrote:
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 12:31:45 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
On Oct 2, 4:53*am, Dean wrote:

On Monday, October 1, 2012 8:54:08 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:

On Sep 30, 8:12*pm, bob haller wrote:

Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the

moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion.

as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive

condition report......

just wondering what nasa expected to happen?

another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric

orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the

moon

with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers

have aged........

wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?

According to all things NASA/Apollo, the moon is actually quite

reflective, monochromatic and otherwise totally inert. *So, everything

should still be in 100% perfect condition.

No. according to YOU, that's what NASA/Apollo is saying. *The reality is otherwise but like most conspiracy nuts, your thoughts are not quite rooted in reality.

Our NASA/Apollo reality is mostly subjective, because most of their

supposedly worthy forensics is missing in action, and oddly can't be

replicated by anyone because the fly-by-rocket technology of that era

simply isn't trustworthy or sufficiently documented so that others

could follow in their footsteps.

Holy hell guthball, don't you spout your conspiracy theories enough already? *You need to start taking your lithium. *Unless that is, the government really is out to get you.

In other words, you got nothing outside of whatever's NASA/Apollo
published, because they were the one and only honest government agency
of our mutually perpetrated cold-war era.

I bet you also believed each and every word spouted by GW Bush, Dick
Cheney and Kissinger.

How many other obfuscation protected FUD-masters and liars do you
associate yourself with?

In article ,
says...

bob haller wrote:

Did nasa ever state what would happen to the lower stage left on the
moon?? If the hydrazine fuels leaked it could of caused a explosion.
as far as I know orbital photos arent good enough for a definitive
condition report......

just wondering what nasa expected to happen?

another one would be snoopy which appeared to end up in heliospheric
orbit...... or some left over 2nd stages that werent crashed into the
moon

with the fuels and batteries, and gases i wonder how these leftovers
have aged........

wouldnt it be wonderful to retrieve some of these artifacts?


With so much that we COULD do in space, Bobbert wants to devolve to
archaeology....

He's brought up this sort of thing before and he's been told the
numerous reasons why it will never happen. Beating a dead horse seems
to be a theme with Bob.

Jeff
--
"the perennial claim that hypersonic airbreathing propulsion would
magically make space launch cheaper is nonsense -- LOX is much cheaper
than advanced airbreathing engines, and so are the tanks to put it in
and the extra thrust to carry it." - Henry Spencer

archealogy is fine but tourism is a income generator...

now answer me this why all the excitement about the shuttles going to
museums? they will be big tourism draws.

now imagine here we have a flown snoopy lost in heliospheric orbit for
60 years.... although it did not land on the moon it was the first LM
to orbit the moon and its testing allowed the later landing.....

I am wondering if they even survived in pretty good shape without
major damage from volatile explosions etc??


over here we have some fragments of the apollo 11 LM uper stage it
crashed into the moon some months after the landing and its crash site
was located and these fragments recovered by a rover that happened to
spot it........

tourism is a major industry for our country

bob haller wrote:
archealogy is fine but tourism is a income generator...

now answer me this why all the excitement about the shuttles going to
museums? they will be big tourism draws.

Umm, no one has to fly to the Moon to retrieve a Space Shuttle.

T.B.

On Oct 2, 12:24*pm, The Mighty TB wrote:
bob haller wrote:
archealogy is fine but tourism is a income generator...

now answer me this why all the excitement about the shuttles going to
museums? they will be big tourism draws.

Umm, no one has to fly to the Moon to retrieve a Space Shuttle.

T.B.

retrieving snoopy could be a non manned mission provided snoopy is in
decent shape, but a manned mission would have pizaz, if done long with
some other worthy activity.

plus it would provide some real science about how such a artifact
survives in deep space for 50 years.

might be possible to recover snoopy while visiting a asteroid...