![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 5:54*am, "Brian Gaff" wrote:
In the item below I see we seem to still be talking huge solids. I thought the vibration problems associated with the chaotic burning etc, was a problem? If they are determined to use this technology, I just wondered how much is need and how much is politics. *In effect this is what is done on other *designs but perhaps rather larger and a bigger proportion of the thrust, but it does seem counter intuitive to me. *Kind of like saying, oh dear we have this core stage but it will be too slow of the pad so lets lift the tank with solids like wot we did on Shuttle. Brian July 13, 2012 Trent J. Perrotto Headquarters, Washington 202-358-0321 Kim Henry Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala. 256-544-0034 RELEASE: 12-234 NASA SELECTS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM ADVANCED BOOSTER PROPOSALS WASHINGTON -- NASA has selected six proposals to improve the affordability, reliability and performance of an advanced booster for the Space Launch System (SLS). The awardees will develop engineering demonstrations and risk reduction concepts for SLS, a heavy-lift rocket that will provide an entirely new capability for human exploration beyond low Earth orbit. "The initial SLS heavy-lift rocket begins with the proven hardware, technology and capabilities we have today and will evolve over time to a more capable launch vehicle through competitive opportunities," said William Gerstenmaier, associate administrator for the Human Exploration Operations Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. "While the SLS team is making swift progress on the initial configuration and building a solid baseline, we also are looking ahead to enhance and upgrade future configurations of the heavy lift vehicle. We want to build a system that will be upgradable and used for decades." Designed to be flexible for launching spacecraft, including NASA's Orion multipurpose vehicle, for crew and cargo missions SLS will enable NASA to meet the president's goal of sending humans to an asteroid by 2025 and to Mars in the 2030s. The initial SLS configuration will use two five-segment solid rocket boosters similar to the solid rocket boosters that helped power the space shuttle to orbit. The evolved SLS vehicle will require an advanced booster with significant increase in thrust from any existing U.S. liquid or solid boosters. Individual awards will vary with a total NASA investment of as much as $200 million. Proposals selected for contract negotiations a -- "Subscale Composite Tank Set," Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Aerospace Systems -- "Full-Scale Combustion Stability Demonstration," Aerojet General Corp. -- "F-1 Engine Risk Reduction Task," Dynetics Inc. -- "Main Propulsion System Risk Reduction Task," Dynetics Inc. -- "Structures Risk Reduction Task," Dynetics Inc. -- "Integrated Booster Static Test," ATK Launch Systems Inc. "We are building a new national capability to carry astronauts and science experiments beyond Earth orbit to new destinations in space," said Todd May, SLS program manager at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. "Our industry partners have presented a variety of options for reducing risk while increasing performance and affordability, and we're looking forward to seeing their innovative ideas come to life." The proposal selections are the first step in the NASA Research Announcement procurement process. The second step, the formal contract award, will follow after further negotiations between NASA and selected organizations. All funded efforts will demonstrate and examine advanced booster concepts and hardware demonstrations during a 30-month period. This risk mitigation acquisition precedes the follow-on design, development, testing and evaluation competition for the SLS advanced booster currently planned for 2015. All proposals will be valid for 12 months to allow for a later award should the opportunity become available, unless withdrawn by the offeror prior to award. Successful offerors to this NRA are not guaranteed an award for any future advanced booster acquisition. The first test flight of NASA's Space Launch System, which will feature a configuration for a 77-ton (70-metric-ton) lift capacity, is scheduled for 2017. As SLS evolves, a two-stage launch vehicle configuration will provide a lift capability of 143 tons (130 metric tons). Marshall manages the SLS Program for the agency. For information about NASA's Space Launch System, visit: www.nasa.gov/sls -end- -- -- From the sofa of Brian Gaff - Blind user, so no pictures please! SLS is pure pork the piggie squeals with delight as the money gets wasted.. musk has a heavy lift design nearly as large as the saturn 5 besides the vibration issues why duplicate something you can already have? unless your congress and need to buy some votes ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article a0d8b403-e4ac-410b-a09c-1625714a18d6
@x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com, says... SLS is pure pork the piggie squeals with delight as the money gets wasted.. It all depends on your point of view. musk has a heavy lift design nearly as large as the saturn 5 No, he does not. besides the vibration issues why duplicate something you can already have? We don't have heavy lift at this point in time. unless your congress and need to buy some votes ![]() I see spelling and grammar errors galore. Jeff -- " Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. ![]() - tinker |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 16, 10:11*am, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article a0d8b403-e4ac-410b-a09c-1625714a18d6 @x39g2000yqx.googlegroups.com, says... SLS is pure pork the piggie squeals with delight as the money gets wasted.. It all depends on your point of view. musk has a heavy lift design nearly as large as the saturn 5 No, he does not. besides the vibration issues why duplicate something you can already have? We don't have heavy lift at this point in time. unless your congress and need to buy some votes ![]() I see spelling and grammar errors galore. Jeff -- " Ares 1 is a prime example of the fact that NASA just can't get it * up anymore... and when they can, it doesn't stay up long. ![]() * *- tinker still you appear to understand my post ![]() Space X is working on a heavy lifter roughly saturn equivalent ![]() If their for Falcon speed is applied to SLS heavy lift NASA will still be studying while falcon has flown and hopefully gone places ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Space Launch System Core Stage Moves From Concept to Design | Dr J R Stockton[_166_] | Policy | 3 | June 23rd 12 07:06 PM |
NASA Seeks Space Launch System Advanced Development Solutions | Alan Erskine[_3_] | Policy | 10 | March 28th 12 07:11 AM |
SLS (Space Launch System) ancient, a truck, no better than 40 years ago | Rich[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | September 14th 11 10:14 PM |
Say you had a perfect space launch system. | allo allo | Policy | 27 | December 18th 04 07:42 AM |