![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For what.
Brian -- -- From the sofa of Brian Gaff - Blind user, so no pictures please! "Alan Erskine" wrote in message nd.com... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19/05/2012 7:09 PM, Brian Gaff wrote:
For what. Brian According to Elon Musk: "Launch aborted: slightly high combustion chamber pressure on engine 5. Will adjust limits for countdown in a few days." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see tweaking going on, I wonder how much it costs to keep aborting though.
Still better safe than sorry. Brian -- -- From the sofa of Brian Gaff - Blind user, so no pictures please! "Alan Erskine" wrote in message ond.com... On 19/05/2012 7:09 PM, Brian Gaff wrote: For what. Brian According to Elon Musk: "Launch aborted: slightly high combustion chamber pressure on engine 5. Will adjust limits for countdown in a few days." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sure hope this launch goes well - as failures could mean Mr Musk's
big reveal of his Mars plans being shelved for a long time. Sounds like some sort of reworking of Mars direct(fuel being made on Mars itself for the return journey.) -- T |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Gaff wrote on 5/19/2012 :
For what. Twittering to Usenet. (I would guess the bird is chirping about SpaceX and the attempted Falcon 9 launch.) /dps -- Who, me? And what lacuna? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[tweetish post quoted in its entirety]
Followup comment: "This is not a failure," Shotwell said. "We aborted with purpose. It would have been a failure if we had lifted off with an engine trending in this direction." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47486307/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.T7fyYetYuSo /dps -- Who, me? And what lacuna? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snidely noted that:
[tweetish post quoted in its entirety] Followup comment: "This is not a failure," Shotwell said. "We aborted with purpose. It would have been a failure if we had lifted off with an engine trending in this direction." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47486307/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.T7fyYetYuSo http://www.space.com/15767-spacex-dragon-launch-aborted-video.html for those of us who weren't on the correct sleep-cycle to watch live. (I don't have popups fully disabled on the browser I opened that up on, and so got the ad for the Starship Enterprise Pizza Cutter.) /dps -- Who, me? And what lacuna? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20/05/2012 11:56 AM, JF Mezei wrote:
Snidely wrote: Followup comment: "This is not a failure," Shotwell said. "We aborted with purpose. I agree. It seems that launch aborts are not infrequent (except perhaps for Soyuz which has had many decades of breaking-in). Even the Shuttle had frequent launch aborts due to some small glitch. It is good that they detected the glitch and aborted. Getting fireworks like has happened to Arianne a few times is really bad PR. 'They' didn't detect it; the on-board safety system did that. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
'They' didn't detect it; the on-board safety system did that. things happen too fast for humans to respond...... thats what ultimately will drive robots with AI for exploration ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Max Launch Abort System successfully tested | Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)[_10_] | Policy | 0 | July 10th 09 12:15 PM |
Orion Max Launch Abort test vehicle | Pat Flannery | History | 11 | June 15th 09 02:04 PM |
Soyuz launch abort sequence | [email protected] | History | 1 | August 23rd 08 02:50 PM |
ATSP Launch Abort Mode | [email protected] | History | 6 | June 8th 07 11:56 AM |
SpaceX launch abort | Joe Strout | Policy | 3 | March 21st 07 12:34 AM |