![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi there, I'm going to be buying a new telescope soon but I'm a little
confused about the interaction between different kinds of mounts and the GOTO computer features on the Meade & Celestron SCTs! I've had an 8" Newtonian on an equatorial mount before, but I'm very tempted by the ease-of-use of a GOTO system. I'm looking at buying an 8-10" SCT. Although initially it will be used for "fun", I want to get into some more serious astrophotography at some point. Therefore I understand that I really want an equatorial mount - fork mounts just won't cut the mustard. But I'm also attracted by the idea of "a quick two-star alignment and go" on the fork mounts. I've had a look at the Celestron & Meade manuals. But the manuals seem to suggest you can do "quick two-star alignment and go" with the equatorially-mounted GOTO systems. How can this be? If the polar axis isn't aligned properly it shouldn't be able to track at all? They do stress that for "serious" astrophotography you will still have to do a proper polar alignment, but also that you can use the equatorial mount with a quick 2-star alignment. Do these computerized equatorial mounts adjust in declination as well as RA? What happens if you have the mount pointing in completely the wrong direction, then do a 2-star alignment and tell it to take it from there? I'm a bit confused! I'd be particularly interested to hear from any users of the Celestron CGE mount! Many thanks for your helpful replies, Phil. P.S. I live in England, so I'll probably never get to use the thing anyway (weather)! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Edmonds" wrote in message om... I've had a look at the Celestron & Meade manuals. But the manuals seem to suggest you can do "quick two-star alignment and go" with the equatorially-mounted GOTO systems. How can this be? If the polar axis isn't aligned properly it shouldn't be able to track at all? An altazimuth mount is merely a badly misaligned equatorial mount (maybe 40 degrees off the pole). The same mathematics will correct for a small alignment error when you're in equatorial mode but inaccurately set up. The mount tracks on both axes. Note that the classic LX200 (non-GPS) does not do this; it has to be perfectly polar-aligned to work well in equatorial mode. Do these computerized equatorial mounts adjust in declination as well as RA? What happens if you have the mount pointing in completely the wrong direction, then do a 2-star alignment and tell it to take it from there? I'm a bit confused! It should work. Two star positions tell it the position of the whole celestial sphere. It may think it's upside down and on the other side of the earth, but it will still know where the stars are. I'd be particularly interested to hear from any users of the Celestron CGE mount! Haven't tried that one -- sorry. For more on how computerized telescopes work, see my book. -- Clear skies, Michael Covington -- www.covingtoninnovations.com Author, Astrophotography for the Amateur and (new) How to Use a Computerized Telescope |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many thanks for that Michael, that helps my understanding.
BTW, had a copy of your astrophotography book since the first edition - must get the new version when I get my new scope. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Phil. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Computer History Museum Upcoming Events | Eugene Miya | Technology | 0 | July 10th 04 09:02 AM |
Death to psychotronic weaponry (part 3) | Vierlingj | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 13th 04 05:45 PM |
Death to psychotronic weaponry (part 2) | Vierlingj | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 13th 04 05:44 PM |
Brain Signals From The Paralyzed or Injured Captured By Computer | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | November 10th 03 05:20 PM |
Canada's fastest computer simulates galaxies, black holes (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 08:15 PM |