![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been using Home Planet
(http://fourmilab.ch/homeplanet/homeplanet.html) for a few days, and have noticed some inaccuracies with the satellite tracking. For example, the position of ISS (ZARYA). Orbital tracking (http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata...ing/index.html) returns this data: 37.6 S 38.9 E Alt. 379.24 km Home Planet's default SATELITE.SAT returns this data (rounded): 9.4 N 51.4 E Alt. 288.89 km And the current NORAD two-line element set from Celestrak (http://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/stations.txt) returns this data (rounded): 25.7 S 31.4 E Alt. 378.60 km Also note the conflicting positions of TERRA (http://terra.nasa.gov/) From SATELITE.SAT: 11.27 S 80.71 E Alt. 655.57 km From Celestrak (http://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/resource.txt): 64.33 S 33.94 E Alt. 702.95 km Now, my questions: Why don't both the SATELITE.SAT and Celestrak data approximate the actual position of the ISS? How can I fix it so they do? Which data sets are more trustworthy/accurate: the default SATELITE.SAT or the sets from Celestrak? Is there a more accurate source for two-line element sets? Thanks in advance, Zachary Antolak |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hans Moravec's Original Rotovator Paper | James Bowery | Policy | 0 | July 6th 04 07:45 AM |
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work | Majestyk | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 14th 04 09:44 AM |
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) | expert | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 13th 04 12:05 PM |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Home Planet satellite inaccuracies | Zachary Antolak | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 7th 03 09:38 PM |