![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hello, world\n
recently I've been pondering the question if there is something like a "surface" of the Sun. Let me try to define the term surface more precisely: Consider a graph with the density over distance from center ("density profile"). Considering a fixed location on Earth there would be a very localized decrease from about 1000kg/m^3 to 1kg/m^3 (ocean surface to atmosphere) within only a few meters near what we call the radius of the Earth. The decrease in density is even larger if at the fixed point there is a transition solid-atmosphere. Now for the Sun, if at some fixed point we ignore effects due to medium scale rising/receding fluids, what would the density profile of the Sun look like? I don't expect a factor 1000 decrease in density over a few meters, but what exactly would the profile look like? Regards, Jens -- Jens Schweikhardt http://www.schweikhardt.net/ SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/09/2011 12:18, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
hello, world\n recently I've been pondering the question if there is something like a "surface" of the Sun. Let me try to define the term surface more precisely: Consider a graph with the density over distance from center ("density profile"). Considering a fixed location on Earth there would be a very localized decrease from about 1000kg/m^3 to 1kg/m^3 (ocean surface to atmosphere) within only a few meters near what we call the radius of the Earth. The decrease in density is even larger if at the fixed point there is a transition solid-atmosphere. Now for the Sun, if at some fixed point we ignore effects due to medium scale rising/receding fluids, what would the density profile of the Sun look like? I don't expect a factor 1000 decrease in density over a few meters, but what exactly would the profile look like? Regards, Jens The generally accepted definition for the 'surface' of the sun is the Photosphere; that region where the optical depth is about 70% - i.e. there is a 70% chance that a photon emitted at that position will escape. There is a plot of 'density'on the right of the Wikipedia page; though it's a multi-axis plot, which I've only had a quick look at Wiki Page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosphere Density plot http://history.nasa.gov/SP-402/p2.htm NB that the Y axis is height and density is plotted on a log axis. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |