A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 26th 11, 02:36 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

Earth's Moon is the only moon that has a theory it came to be by coming out of the Earth. That is crazy Capture fits #1 Moon has no atmosphere #2 Moon has no water.#3 Moon has very little iron #4 Moon is like an asteroid being its a sand pit and covered with craters upon crates,and its worse on its farside. I have always gone with the thinking Earth and Moon comprise a binary planet system. TreBert
  #2  
Old July 26th 11, 03:52 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured


"G=EMC^2" wrote in message
...
Earth's Moon is the only moon that has a theory it came to be by coming out
of the Earth. That is crazy

*** No, it's not. Bill Hartman pretty much put that dog to rest by computer
modeling ... but I'm trying to convince a natural borm moron, just like
GuthBall ... my bad.


Capture fits #1 Moon has no atmosphere #2 Moon has no water.

*** Crater on the moon located at the North Pole and at the South Pole
contain ice, which is frozen water. You can use your refrigerator's freezer
compartment to experiment.

#3 Moon has very little iron

*** The reason the Moon has very littl iron is because the Earth has more
than it should have ... could merging cores have anything to do with that
???


#4 Moon is like an asteroid being its a sand pit and covered with craters
upon crates,and its worse on its farside.

*** Both sides, falsely called the near side and the far side, have pretty
much the same amount of cratering, you idiot. Even though the Moon is in a
tidal lock with the Earth, all sides are equally exposed to the debris
zipping through the Solar System.

I have always gone with the thinking Earth and Moon comprise a binary planet
system. TreBert

*** Of course you'd be wrong once again. The Bary-center is still within the
Earth's radius, unlike Pluto and Charon which should be called a binary
planet system. But you'd also be too stupid to know that. You really know
nothing, do you ...


  #3  
Old July 26th 11, 04:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Bast[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,917
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured



Hägar wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message
...
Earth's Moon is the only moon that has a theory it came to be by coming
out of the Earth. That is crazy

*** No, it's not. Bill Hartman pretty much put that dog to rest by
computer modeling ... but I'm trying to convince a natural borm moron,
just like GuthBall ... my bad.


Capture fits #1 Moon has no atmosphere #2 Moon has no water.

*** Crater on the moon located at the North Pole and at the South Pole
contain ice, which is frozen water. You can use your refrigerator's
freezer compartment to experiment.

#3 Moon has very little iron

*** The reason the Moon has very littl iron is because the Earth has
more than it should have ... could merging cores have anything to do
with that ???


#4 Moon is like an asteroid being its a sand pit and covered with
craters upon crates,and its worse on its farside.

*** Both sides, falsely called the near side and the far side, have
pretty much the same amount of cratering, you idiot. Even though the
Moon is in a tidal lock with the Earth, all sides are equally exposed
to the debris zipping through the Solar System.

I have always gone with the thinking Earth and Moon comprise a binary
planet system. TreBert

*** Of course you'd be wrong once again. The Bary-center is still
within the Earth's radius, unlike Pluto and Charon which should be
called a binary planet system. But you'd also be too stupid to know
that. You really know nothing, do you ...






LEAVE PLUTO ALONE !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p3oxXLdWus


  #4  
Old July 26th 11, 05:53 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,245
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

Don't bet on it! BEERTbrainMORONIDIOT has always CLAIMED THERE IS NO
WATER ON MARS!

NO-BELL PRIZE IS IT!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:39:40 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

On Jul 26, 6:36*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
Earth's Moon is the only moon that has a theory it came to be by

coming out of the Earth. That is crazy * Capture fits *#1 Moon has no
atmosphere #2 Moon has no water.#3 Moon has very little iron #4 Moon
is like an asteroid being its a sand pit and covered with craters upon
crates,and its worse on its farside. *I have always gone with the
thinking Earth and Moon comprise a binary planet system. TreBert

That's perfectly good enough for a Nobel.

However, its 2500 km monstrous polar crater has to mean something
really-really big and massive (such as Earth) bumped into our moon, or
vise versa.

Brad Guth, WHAT AN IDIOT I AM!

  #5  
Old July 26th 11, 06:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,245
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

PLUTO HAS FOUR MOONS AS I POSTED RECENTLY!

YOU HAVE NO SAY IN THIS SO **** OFF, *******!

IDIOT!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:57 -0400, "Bast"
wrote:

LEAVE PLUTO ALONE !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p3oxXLdWus

  #6  
Old July 26th 11, 10:59 PM posted to alt.astronomy
HVAC[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,114
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

On 7/26/2011 11:30 AM, Bast wrote:


*** Of course you'd be wrong once again. The Bary-center is still
within the Earth's radius, unlike Pluto and Charon which should be
called a binary planet system. But you'd also be too stupid to know
that. You really know nothing, do you ...






LEAVE PLUTO ALONE !!!




Ya! And leave Mickey and Goofy alone too!









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo
  #7  
Old July 27th 11, 12:57 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured


"HVAC" wrote in message
...
On 7/26/2011 11:30 AM, Bast wrote:


*** Of course you'd be wrong once again. The Bary-center is still
within the Earth's radius, unlike Pluto and Charon which should be
called a binary planet system. But you'd also be too stupid to know
that. You really know nothing, do you ...






LEAVE PLUTO ALONE !!!




Ya! And leave Mickey and Goofy alone too!


We know who Goofy is ... does that make BeeeertBrain ... gasp ... Mickey ???


  #8  
Old July 27th 11, 11:03 AM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 164
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

On Jul 26, 10:52*am, "H gar" wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

...
Earth's Moon is the only moon that has a theory it came to be by coming out
of the Earth. That is crazy

*** No, it's not. Bill Hartman pretty much put that dog to rest by computer
modeling ... but I'm trying to convince a natural borm moron, just like
GuthBall ... my bad.

Capture fits *#1 Moon has no atmosphere #2 Moon has no water.

*** Crater on the moon located at the North Pole and at the South Pole
contain ice, which is frozen water. You can use your refrigerator's freezer
compartment to experiment.

#3 Moon has very little iron

*** The reason the Moon has very littl iron is because the Earth has more
than it should have ... could merging cores have anything to do with that
???

#4 Moon is like an asteroid being its a sand pit and covered with craters
upon crates,and its worse on its farside.

*** Both sides, falsely called the near side and the far side, *have pretty
much the same amount of cratering, you idiot. Even though the Moon is in a
tidal lock with the Earth, all sides are equally exposed to the debris
zipping through the Solar System.

I have always gone with the thinking Earth and Moon comprise a binary planet
system. TreBert

*** Of course you'd be wrong once again. The Bary-center is still within the
Earth's radius, unlike Pluto and Charon which should be called a binary
planet system. But you'd also be too stupid to know that. *You really know
nothing, do you ...


Your answers to how the moon got there are funny. Like Earth has more
iron than it should have ha Ha Ha That there is ice water at the
poles Ha Ha Ha You are a complete idiot. Easy to see far side of
moon has much more craters but not you. Far side of moon gets hit
more and for good reason. If only you could think You should study
more. Let Google be your friend. TreBert
  #9  
Old July 29th 11, 04:33 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,655
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

They are both round,but nothing else fits the Moon being part of the Earth "once upon a time" Moon has lots of the element iridium and its very rare on Earth. Get The Picture TreBert
  #10  
Old July 29th 11, 05:24 PM posted to alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,245
Default Reasons Why Moon Had To Be Captured

What black comet, IDIOT GOOFY?

Cruithne DOES NOT ORBIT THE EARTH, YOU ****ING MORON!

Where's THE PIG? HE'S GOT HIS HEAD STUCK HARD UP A PIG'S ASSHOLE!

Saul Levy


On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:52:26 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

Galaxies are essentially capable of captures, as well as mergers and
offering multiple reasons within that enable further captures. Anyone
that denies capture as a basic physics method of cosmic orbital
mechanics and solar system formations isn't being honest with him/
herself or others. This isn't to say that stars haven't created the
majority of whatever is associated.

The recent Trojan asteroid is simply another example of a capture, as
well as "3753 Cruithne".

BTW; we almost got nailed by a black asteroid/comet, and perhaps the
next time around we'll get another encounter at less than 1r. Where's
our contributor of doom and gloom (aka Warhol) when we need him?

Brad Guth, I'M A STUPID IDIOT!

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Our captured moon(Selene) Bast[_2_] Misc 1 February 6th 10 01:42 AM
8 Reasons Why Going Back to the Moon Is Loony by MARGARET WERTHEIM Space Cadet Policy 44 February 8th 06 03:44 AM
8 Reasons Why Going Back to the Moon Is Loony Space Cadet Policy 0 January 6th 06 01:04 PM
Moon bases too far, captured asteroid nearer :-) Bounty Astronomy Misc 1 February 2nd 05 06:11 AM
Three planets and the Moon captured Andy Lawes Amateur Astronomy 6 March 24th 04 01:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.