Chapt15 Doppler shift occurs only for sound waves, not light waves#440 Atom Totality 4th ed

I just responded to a post that said the Space telescope and other
equipment does not have fiberglass windows but rather glass.

What that is referring to, is my experiment using some form of plastic
or fiberglass of a greenhouse and seeing a redshift of oncoming
automobile
headlights. The importance of my experiment is to indicate that Cosmic
redshift is likely to be an affect of the curvature of Space and not
caused
by the relative motion of a star to earth observer.

That the probability of about 1/2 of all observed stars and galaxies
are moving towards Earth and the other 1/2 moving away from Earth, and
that the redshift, although an indication of distance, is not a good
marker
of distance but rather only a marker of how curved the space is in
travelling that distance to Earth.

And any blueshift seen in stars, means basically those stars are close
enough to Earth for their light to not travel through a highly curved
space. I believe, if memory serves me that all blue shifted stars are
so relatively close to Earth.

So what I am saying in these chapters about Doppler shifting, is that
it is a true phenomenon only for sound waves, but not for light waves.
That the Cosmic redshift is not a Doppler effect but rather a effect
of light travelling through a curved space, just as an oncoming
automobile white headlight is seen redshifted in my greenhouse
fiberglass panel.

So what I have got to do is show where the physicists of pure physics
went wrong in their assumptions that light can be Doppler shifted. I
am using Halliday and Resnick old physics books.

And the answer to the question of why the physicists went wrong has
more to do with the fact that much of the subject of astronomy bought
the idea of a Doppler redshift, especially with Hubble, a long time
ago, that if any physicists of a better mind had raised objections to
light having been Doppler shifted, then those physicists would have
received all types of wrath and scorn, even though they were correct
and all the others were blithering fools about it.

Now I have a beautiful sight before me here in my study, tonight. I
have two Halliday and Resnick physics books in front of me. One was
written 1988 and the other was 1986. The older one was the advanced
physics and the younger one was the freshman class physics. The older
one has the Ives-Stilwell Experiment and talks of Doppler light shift
on pages 929 to 932. The younger text talks of Doppler shift on light
on pages 433 to 435.

Now the reason I have both books opened up in front of me, is because
Halliday and Resnick put their finger onto the objection that
light can even or ever have a Doppler shift. And that Doppler shift of
light waves is a bogus phenomenon.

On page 433, Fundamentals of Physics, H&R, 3rd edition, 1988, H &
R state that even though the Doppler equations for light and sound
are very different, at low enough speeds, they can reduce to the same
approximate result.

Now I ask, what made H&R write that? The only truth in the matter is
that the equations are different, very much so, and so a Doppler shift
on light is not even possible. And the only reason that H&R say that
reduce to approximate result is because the entire astronomy community
has believed the redshift of light is a Doppler affect.

In the other text book of H&R on page 931 says that the data agrees
with the theory of special relativity and not from the classical
formula
borrowed from sound wave propagation.

Now I think that modern day physics should include the recent data and
discoveries over the "slowing down of light waves" and the fact that
this slowed down light is still white light and not redshifted light.
Modern textbooks on physics should include this into the section where
they talk about Doppler shifting and as proof that light waves are not
Doppler shifted.

And that the entire astronomy community begins to recognize and
concede that the use of Doppler redshift of light is only an
indication of
how bent Space is where that light travelled through.

And that the distances to galaxies far away is only reliable by use of
telescopic imaging, so that if the image of a faraway galaxy is a tiny
image, then of course, it really is far away and the limit of distance
is
approximately 400 million light years and no more of this distances
beyond the limit of telescopic imaging.

It is time for astronomers to stop living in their fantasy world of
Doppler redshift of light.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Even Hubble do not accept Doppler redshift of light as this written on
Hubble:
--- quoting from Wikipedia on Edwin Hubble ---
Hubble believed that his count data gave a more reasonable result
concerning spatial curvature if the redshift correction was made
assuming no recession. To the very end of his writings he maintained
this position, favouring (or at the very least keeping open) the model
where no true expansion exists, and therefore that the redshift
"represents a hitherto unrecognized principle of nature."[10]
--- end quoting Wikipedia ---

That opinion by Hubble has weight and authority since he spent so much
of his lifetime in studying redshift.

So what is the redshift really? It is not the Big Bang explosion and
it is not the relative motion of luminous bodies.

We have two experiments in modern times that tells us what the
redshift is. We have my experiment of greenhouse panels that gives a
redshift of oncoming white light and we have the slowing down of white
light
which shows no redshifting.

Hubble was keen on space curvature and a Atom Totality of the
plutonium 5f6 which is curved lobes, would
give such a redshift.

Again, the trouble with astronomy is that astronomers think they have
only one theory, when in fact there are two competing rival theories
and that the Big Bang is losing in every argument against the Atom
Totality.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies