I this a good idea?

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/

Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display?

On 3/05/2011 8:10 PM, bob haller wrote:
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/

Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display?

It's fine; it's been repaired, re-certified and checked.

In article 9fbf9b60-8e29-4836-9116-
, says...

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/

Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display?

No.

Jeff
--
" Solids are a branch of fireworks, not rocketry. :-) :-) ", Henry
Spencer 1/28/2011

On Tue, 3 May 2011 03:10:54 -0700 (PDT), bob haller
wrote:

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...34/110429tank/

Given its age and history wouldnt this tank be better as a display?

It came through last week's countdown like a champ, better than the
much newer tank for STS-133, in fact.

Brian

On Wed, 4 May 2011 08:17:47 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
wrote:

Could I just make a comment about the web sit in the link?
OK I will anyway. I gave up trying to find the article on that page. Its
got no go to main page details, no headings to navigate with and no
landmarks either, its just a higgledy-piggledy collection of text and links.
For us blind folk a few headings and a go to main page content at the top
would make it a heell of a lot better to navigate without a mouse.

Spaceflightnow.com desperately needs an overhaul. I don't think it has
changed much since the days of Netscape Navigator 2.0.

Brian