Riemannian geometry etc.

On Apr 12, 11:27 pm, PD wrote:
On Apr 10, 1:57 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Well, allow yours truly to remind you that you have fudged up the
equation of relativistic Doppler effect in agreement with the energy
transform. In doing so, you have condemned the relativistic Doppler
effect derived from the time transform. So now, SR can only predict a
blue transverse Doppler effect, and this does not agree with any
experimentations. shrug

Unless you want to take back the mathematics you have fudged up, you
have no right to call anyone else crackpots but yourself and fellow
Einstein Dingleberries. shrug

KW: "Hey, I want the discussion turned back to stuff *I* want to talk
about. Pay attention to ME."

Hmmm... PD is doing his senile whining about being checkmated by
yours truly for the n’th time, and PD can whine all he wants. At the
end of the day in this example, the relativistic Doppler effect as
predicted by SR has no experimental supports. Daryl has exhausted his
fudges. Does PD want to bully his way out of this one? shrug

On Apr 13, 1:39*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Apr 12, 11:27 pm, PD wrote:

On Apr 10, 1:57 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
Well, allow yours truly to remind you that you have fudged up the
equation of relativistic Doppler effect in agreement with the energy
transform. *In doing so, you have condemned the relativistic Doppler
effect derived from the time transform. *So now, SR can only predict a
blue transverse Doppler effect, and this does not agree with any
experimentations. *shrug

Unless you want to take back the mathematics you have fudged up, you
have no right to call anyone else crackpots but yourself and fellow
Einstein Dingleberries. *shrug

KW: "Hey, I want the discussion turned back to stuff *I* want to talk
about. Pay attention to ME."

Hmmm... *PD is doing his senile whining about being checkmated by
yours truly for the n’th time, and PD can whine all he wants. *At the
end of the day in this example, the relativistic Doppler effect as
predicted by SR has no experimental supports. *Daryl has exhausted his
fudges. *Does PD want to bully his way out of this one? *shrug

If you're going to fish with bait, then make sure it's not dead and
rotting.

On Apr 13, 12:07 am, PD wrote:
On Apr 13, 1:39 am, Koobee Wublee wrote:

Hmmm... PD is doing his senile whining about being checkmated by
yours truly for the n’th time, and PD can whine all he wants. At the
end of the day in this example, the relativistic Doppler effect as
predicted by SR has no experimental supports. Daryl has exhausted his
fudges. Does PD want to bully his way out of this one? shrug

If you're going to fish with bait, then make sure it's not dead and
rotting.

Uh, what? Yours truly don’t play riddles. shrug

It sounds like PD is avoiding the issue of failed relativistic Doppler
effect once again. Keep running with your tail between your legs.
Oh, occasional barking back in shamefully unsportsmanlike conduct does
not help your cause of proliferating Einsteinian myths. shrug

You still haven't explained how you think that SR's prediction regarding the
Twins paradox is incorrect.

SR predicts that the travelling twin will return home younger than the stay
at home twin. What do you think would happen?