Equations

On Apr 2, 9:34 am, "Tom Keske" wrote:

What fools these physicists be
Every equation reduces ultimately to the same triviality:

A = A

Well, if you can show two seemingly unrelated quantities as
equivalent, you are on to something wonder. However, if you start
with two quantities that are obviously equivalent, you are an
alchemist. For example:

After attempting to derive the Lorentz transform with gibberish in the
1905 paper of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar,
Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar thought he could do
better in his book on relativity.

Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar started with two
equations equating zero with zero, and voila, the Lorentz transform
was pulled out of the hat.

If you and yours truly were to attempt this stunt, we would be shouted
down as idiots, but if Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar did it, the self-styled physicists were and still are bedazzled.
In doing so, they continue to worship Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god, and they would do that even if
science is sacrificed.

shrug

no, that's the problem;
you also seem to rely upon mere eqautions,
without giving any kine of hypothetical treatment
of "the problem of relativity," or
just the existence of it.

can you show either necessity or sufficiency?

chuckles

pounds keyboard of public terminal,
DEMANDING that Kooby-doo answer
to every God-am query

hutusgwrhj j asio489ghn 90wtkl ai849asj 94jgjko49sv,bnpa; na[wi
uiejn ;sdjfh ;asd b org a'sk