proofs that Positron Space = Gravity #358 Atom Totality theory 4th ed

Chapter 13

The list below seems to keep getting bigger and bigger. Perhaps there
is a "deciding experiment". Perhaps the reason that no gravity waves
were ever discovered but that
positrons were discovered in the "vacuum of Space" qualifies as the
Deciding Experiment.
However, I feel that a group or collection of proofs is going to be a
deciding Experiment
that gravity is just Space = positrons.

Now there should be several proofs that Positrons are the force of
gravity and I venture to list a partial list:

(a) Positrons would have no minimum mass to form a gravitational
bonded system, whereas mass-gravity has a minimum that is larger than
some 
reported asteroids gravitationally bound. If you have a few
positrons 
in the center of a asteroid you can quickly have a bound
system with 
other 
asteroids.

(b) The oblateness of planets and stars should not exist to the
extent 
seen with mass-gravity. The agreement between observed
oblateness and 
theoretical oblateness is better with positron-
gravity.

(c) Resonance of gravitational bounded systems is easier to explain
with gravity as Positrons than with gravity as mass.

(d) The extremely close and tight orbits of huge exoplanets around
their 
exostars found in the 1990s and 2000s implies the positron-
gravity 
over that 
of the mass-gravity.

(e) Now I do understand there are alot of problems of theory of
supernova explosions, what triggers them
and the time delays. So I think Supernova explosions study and
research would be a nice natural laboratory
to distinguish between gravity as mass-gravity or gravity as
positron-
gravity.

Also, there is a conundrum in the physics community as to when a star
becomes a
nova or supernova and the fine line between a star going black-hole.
Well, if gravity
is positron space, then you can never collect more than a given amount
of positrons
for that center-of-the-star to ever go black-hole.

(f) Now this one maybe classified under resonance but I list it
separately. If gravity
is positron-Space rather than mass-gravity, then each Stellar System
has a distance
away from the gravitational center of that system where a planet can
form to have
its rings such as Saturn rings. So that each stellar system has a
special distance away
from the center of the stellar system to have a planet such as Saturn.
In gravity = positron Space the mathematics for a unique Saturn in
every stellar system is true, but in a
gravity = mass theory, we should not have a Saturn with rings. The
basic idea is that
Space = positron = gravity is far more stable of a overall system than
is gravity = mass system. The stability of electric charge attraction
as gravity is overall far more stable than
a system where every piece of mass participates in the overall
stability. And the rings of
Saturn are a result of more stability and equilibrium than can a
gravity= mass offer.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies