![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Apr 2004 07:46:01 GMT, John Griffin wrote:
"Laura" wrote: "*" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 05:14:01 +0200, "Laura" wrote: "Robert Buchanan" wrote in message .71.68... Bookman wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I will now reply to: Heh. Just wait until she moves into grays and CIA/Halliburton territory. That's when she's in her prime. Yes, and everybody knows that Elerium 115 is the key to free energy, anyway! ;-) Highly refined aluminum, 100% pure, which we're not capable of manufacturing without nanotechnology. How would that amount to *free* energy? Your question might free her energy for other crazy ideas. "Alexia" just makes weird claims. She doesn't attempt to back them up. Apparently she abandoned the crackpots who claim you can somehow get more energy by burning hydrogen than it takes to break the resulting water molecules. If she doesn't drop the aluminum stories, I bet she can eventually find a crackpot whose website says that he has developed COLD ALUMINUM FUSION, and that it produces enough energy to "manufacture" twice as much aluminum as it uses. Just wait until she finds out that aluminum is an element. You're off your meds again. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09 Apr 2004 22:17:11 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote: * wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I will now reply to: On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 05:14:01 +0200, "Laura" wrote: "Robert Buchanan" wrote in message 78.71.68... Bookman wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I will now reply to: Heh. Just wait until she moves into grays and CIA/Halliburton territory. That's when she's in her prime. Yes, and everybody knows that Elerium 115 is the key to free energy, anyway! ;-) Highly refined aluminum, 100% pure, which we're not capable of manufacturing without nanotechnology. Do you even know the difference between elements and compounds, Alexa? Do you even know what aluminum is composed of, or how it's manufactured? Silly bitch. When will you grow up, get a clue and stop trolling? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: On 09 Apr 2004 22:17:11 GMT, Robert Buchanan wrote: * wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I will now reply to: On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 05:14:01 +0200, "Laura" wrote: "Robert Buchanan" wrote in message 78.71.68... Bookman wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I will now reply to: Heh. Just wait until she moves into grays and CIA/Halliburton territory. That's when she's in her prime. Yes, and everybody knows that Elerium 115 is the key to free energy, anyway! ;-) Highly refined aluminum, 100% pure, which we're not capable of manufacturing without nanotechnology. Do you even know the difference between elements and compounds, Alexa? Do you even know what aluminum is composed of, or how it's manufactured? Silly bitch. When will you grow up, get a clue and stop trolling? I don't believe you understand what the word means. -=-=-=-=- Official AFA-B Bully, Pest, Antagonist, and Gubmint Disinformation Agent |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Apr 2004 03:02:42 GMT, Robert Buchanan
wrote: Our guest tonight on alt.usenet.kooks is very special...let's all give * a big hand! On 9 Apr 2004 07:46:01 GMT, John Griffin wrote: [...] Just wait until she finds out that aluminum is an element. You told me all I need to know that you're ignorant of current metallurgy. No metal can be refined by our current smelting processes and be 100% pure, that's QUITE impossible. Nanotech can be used to construct pure aluminum, without any of the various trace elements which are found in the aluminum we manufacture by conventional methods. Currently we can only manufacture al which is 99.999% pure. What will we be using 100% pure aluminum for, again? Dick wrap. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* wrote:
On 9 Apr 2004 07:46:01 GMT, John Griffin wrote: "Laura" wrote: "*" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 05:14:01 +0200, "Laura" wrote: "Robert Buchanan" wrote in message .71.68. .. Bookman wrote the following on 08 Apr 2004, which I will now reply to: Heh. Just wait until she moves into grays and CIA/Halliburton territory. That's when she's in her prime. Yes, and everybody knows that Elerium 115 is the key to free energy, anyway! ;-) Highly refined aluminum, 100% pure, which we're not capable of manufacturing without nanotechnology. How would that amount to *free* energy? Your question might free her energy for other crazy ideas. "Alexia" just makes weird claims. She doesn't attempt to back them up. Apparently she abandoned the crackpots who claim you can somehow get more energy by burning hydrogen than it takes to break the resulting water molecules. If she doesn't drop the aluminum stories, I bet she can eventually find a crackpot whose website says that he has developed COLD ALUMINUM FUSION, and that it produces enough energy to "manufacture" twice as much aluminum as it uses. Just wait until she finds out that aluminum is an element. You're off your meds again. Shouldn't you be scrubbing floors or baking some cookies? Yes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Planet_X: Our 10th Planet | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 841 | May 16th 04 05:00 PM |
disaster warning | Anonymous | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 23rd 04 09:31 PM |
eer | FEerguy9 | History | 0 | December 31st 03 03:23 AM |
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS | [email protected] \(formerly\) | Astronomy Misc | 273 | December 28th 03 10:42 PM |
PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 20th 03 04:59 PM |