![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The entire predictions system which now uses computers to speculate on
future temperature conditions of the planet is based on an antecedent model which used timekeeping averages to model the Earth's planetary dynamics and make external predictions using that system,what would now be known as the equatorial coordinate system. The success of determining the day and dates of solar and lunar eclipses or the specific positions of the planets as they move in stellar circumpolar motion which is,in itself ,a consequence of a homogenized average where daily and annual cycles are compounded into right ascension with the known discrepancy of 11 minutes adrift each year as a tiny percentage of the orbital motion of the Earth would be fine were it not that the daily and annual cycles are transfered directly into daily rotation and orbital motion in a system designed on allowing the rotational cycle to drift against the annual cycle - the calendar system in other words. Knowing that the 6 hour orbital drift is omitted each year to allow a steady progression of 24 hour days and picked up by the extra day/ night cycle and 24 hour rotation of Feb 29th should immediately put a stop to alternative conceptions for nothing could be more cruel that the inability to separate the daily and annual cycles nor its dynamical equivalent of daily rotation and orbital motion.Are readers so desperate to ignore what really cannot for the sake of people in the late 17th century who got it wrong and got it wrong in a very specific way. In an effort to push speculative modeling which originates as a toxic strain of empiricism and excludes all else,that side of humanity which must exercise its interpretative skills to modify and adapt is being atrophied to a dangerous extent as the main focus of science has turned into a so-called zero sum game for no good reason other than it was inevitable.It is the weakness of those who imagine astronomy to be a magnification exercise,a photography hobby or some other talentless conception which is at the center of it all,in short,the weakest intellects take the name of astronomers while not practicing this oldest and most noble of all sciences.It shows here in the inability to understand that one 24 hour rotation is responsible for a day/night cycle within the calendar system and this system requires 1461 day/ night cycles to correspond to 4 annual cycles and its dynamical equivalent. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modeling the Big Dipper, Griffith Obs, and Mt. Wilson | Watty | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | October 7th 08 07:37 AM |
Any Celestial Mechanics Modeling Sites? | Bret Cahill | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 9th 05 09:38 AM |
Any Vis Viva Modeling Pages? | Bret Cahill | UK Astronomy | 0 | June 6th 05 10:02 PM |
modeling the Si-based life | Amirsaman | Misc | 4 | March 10th 04 05:38 PM |