![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got a question relating to the Big Bang and I would really
appreciate a non-technical answer. When the Hubble Telescope looks into deep space, it looks back into time, and we can see galaxies as they were billions of years ago. But the Big Bang tells us that ALL this matter was once a single point, and so was connected. I know that during the inflationary period, space expanded at a much faster rate than the speed of light, but I also hear that this inflation only grew the universe from the size of a proton to the size of a grapefruit. If the nearby galaxies were moving away from us at faster than light speeds, then we would not be able to see them, but we can. If we can see them, than they are moving away from us at sub- light speed. And if they were connected to us at the very beginning, then how is it that we can see them now as they were billions of years ago? Myles (Banging on big time) Paulsen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Bang theory is falsified by diffraction pattern of galaxies andage variance of neighboring galaxies; (use in 4th) | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | January 14th 10 08:05 PM |
Group of galaxies found to bend the light of remote galaxies (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 6th 07 05:56 AM |
Group of galaxies found to bend the light of remote galaxies(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 6th 07 05:53 AM |
Binary asteroid in Jupiter's orbit may be icy comet from solarsystem's infancy (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | February 1st 06 07:58 PM |
Old Galaxies in the Young Universe: VLT Unravels New Population of Very Old Massive Galaxies (Forwarded) | greywolf42 | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 11th 04 05:41 PM |