Gamma Ray Bursts -- The REAL CAUSE

Gamma Ray Bursts -- REAL CAUSE

Astro-physicists and astronomers are still scratching
their heads about the mysterious GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. They were
originally thought to originate from "neutron stars" in the
disc of our galaxy. But the new Gamma Ray Telescopes now in
Earth orbit have been detecting them in all directions
uniformly, and their source locations in space do NOT
correspond to any known objects, (except for a few cases of
directional coincidence).

Gamma-ray bursts are a NECESSARY CONSEQUENCE in the
GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe developed by
the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson. According to page 386 of
his book "THE UNIVERSE OF MOTION", published in 1984, the
gamma-ray bursts are coming from SUPERNOVA EXPLOSIONS in the
ANTI-MATTER HALF of the Physical Universe, which Larson calls
the "Cosmic Sector". Because the anti-matter universe exists
in a RECIPROCAL RELATION to our material universe, with the
SPEED OF LIGHT as the BOUNDARY between them, and has THREE
dimensions of TIME, and ONLY ONE dimension of space, the
gamma-ray bursts can pop into our material half ANYWHERE in
space, seemingly at random.

I wonder how close to us in space a source location
would have to be for a gamma-ray burst to kill all or most
life on Earth ! There would be NO WAY to predict one, NOR to
stop it !

Perhaps some of the MASS EXTINCTIONS of the past, which
are now being blamed on impacts of comets and asteroids, were
actually caused by nearby GAMMA RAY BURSTS !


See the web site http://www.rsystem.org/isus/index.htm
or /dbl/index.htm for more information about Physicist Dewey
B. Larson's GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical Universe.

Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460


P.S.: The 3-degree microwave background radiation, which is
assumed to be evidence for the "Big Bang" theory, is
instead actually STAR LIGHT from the ANTI-MATTER HALF
of the Physical Universe.

P.S.2: PASS IT ON !


"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS stranger than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."

Dear REM460:

"REM460" wrote in message
...

Gamma Ray Bursts -- REAL CAUSE

Factory tests at GAMMA ray GUN factories. Soon to located near you.

David A. Smith

:
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC

What on earth does a Bachelor of Surgery have to with Physics and
Astronomy?

It isn't a college degree. It is a description of the post: BS Physics and
Astronomy. The comma is a typo.

Clear Skies

Chuck Taylor
Do you observe the moon?
Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/
And the Lunar Picture of the Day http://www.lpod.org/
************************************

(REM460) wrote in message ...

Gamma Ray Bursts -- REAL CAUSE

Astro-physicists and astronomers are still scratching
their heads about the mysterious GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. They were
originally thought to originate from "neutron stars" in the
disc of our galaxy. But the new Gamma Ray Telescopes now in
Earth orbit have been detecting them in all directions
uniformly, and their source locations in space do NOT
correspond to any known objects, (except for a few cases of
directional coincidence).

[snip]

Crank or not, I want to address the assertion that GRBs are
independant of anything known. That is not true, we have observed some
GRBs which have a supernova's afterglow following immediately after.

(Eric Gisse) wrote in message om...
(REM460) wrote in message ...

Gamma Ray Bursts -- REAL CAUSE

Astro-physicists and astronomers are still scratching
their heads about the mysterious GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. They were
originally thought to originate from "neutron stars" in the
disc of our galaxy. But the new Gamma Ray Telescopes now in
Earth orbit have been detecting them in all directions
uniformly, and their source locations in space do NOT
correspond to any known objects, (except for a few cases of
directional coincidence).

[snip]

Crank or not, I want to address the assertion that GRBs are
independant of anything known. That is not true, we have observed some
GRBs which have a supernova's afterglow following immediately after.


To say that the grb spectra resembles a SN is wishfull thinking at
best for you and the astro phys community. First of all it is only
*ONE* GRB that is cited to supposedly show this `connection`or
progression over weeks , and that is GRB030329, being the brightest to
date studied . This is only ONE out of thousands of grbs recorded
studied overall .
Also the early 7 day spectra of 030329 resembles as closely if not
closer the spectra of the sun implying that the `source` of the grb`s
spectra can better be explained as local and interacting with the
solar wind to produce the result observed .The so called SN connection
is speculative at best and does not match a day to day progression as
claimed . There is a discrepency between day to day time axis of
different papers published which suggests that each paper has to
`adapt` or falsify the original observed datas time axis to `fit` a
SN lightcurve.
Furthermore besides the early grb spectra matching a solar spectra
better than an early SN spectra , the later grb spectra evolves into
one closer to that of earths atmospheric spectra. Suggesting that as
the original solar source dependent spectra decays in intensity the
atmospheric spectra becomes more prominent. Check out
www.gammarayburst.com for details.
And finally other observations of GRB`s rule out any SN/GRB `beamed `
connection. For instance the MM Gonzalez paper rules out beamed theory
(or any standard model based theory for that matter). So does the
revelation that short dark bursts have observable afterglows. And the
almost perfect x-ray halo of a GRB observed recently cannot be
explained unless the GRB source was local . And as the beamed/SN model
neccesitates that a GRB is cosmological in origin then this too shows
that the GRB/SN `beamed`theory is incorrect.
regards
Sean