#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: M41
Taking a short break from Arp galaxies.
M41 is a rather famous open star cluster below Sirius. But at -20 degrees it is down in the winter gunk for me. Still, being one of the more famous M objects I had to give it a try on a really "good" night. More on the imaging issues later. M41 is thought to be about 2300 light-years away. It is a rather sparse but bright star cluster covering about 38 minutes of arc which is larger than my field's width of 33.7 minutes and a lot larger than its height of 22.5 minutes. So I only capture the center of the cluster. It is famous for the K3 orange star at its center though contains other fainter K stars as well. They don't show their color visually in small scopes however so are often overlooked. This is a rather young cluster, thought to be about 190 to 240 million years old. This compares to our sun's age of 4,500 million years. At about magnitude 4.5 it is visible to the naked eye. There's weak evidence Aristotle saw it long before the invention of the telescope. More certain is his discovery of averted vision helping to see faint objects in the night sky. http://www.seds.org/messier/more/m041_ari.html Up here moisture in the air condenses out forming ice crystals our air is so cold, -30C is typical on a good clear night and -40C/F not uncommon. These crystals form a haze over the lake I live on. They literally fall like fine snow out of a clear sky. Imaging low like this means imaging through a lot of this ice crystal haze. Like atmospheric particles these fine ice crystals scatter blue and green light. The center of this image was in a fog of blue and some green light scattered by the brighter stars of the cluster. GradientXterminator had to work overtime but did a great job on this haze. I also forgot I was imaging a cluster and used my normal 10 minute subs. This is way too long for bright star clusters as the stars saturate making it difficult to recover their true color. Fortunately there are techniques for finding the color from the fringes of the star's bloated, overexposed image and using that to color the star. I don't like to do that but did in this case. Of course the over exposure also made the haze from the ice crystals worse as well. Being so low stars distort due to atmospheric refraction. I tried a technique used to reduce motion blur and finally managed to sort of make it work. At least the stars looks somewhat round but bloated. The haze I had hid most of the faint Milky Way background stars. This helped the cluster stars to stand out but does give a rather empty looking background compared to what I'd have otherwise. Unfortunately there are many such Messier objects this low in the sky making it next to impossible for me to image them from this far north. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | August 15th 07 09:36 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 07 01:08 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 12th 07 01:05 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |