What if (Space Accelerating Expansion & the Missing 90% gravity

We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed This shows also gravity needs no
waves TreBert

On 11/1/2010 10:31 PM, bert wrote:
We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed This shows also gravity needs no
waves TreBert



Snarf



--
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so" - Mark Twain

On Nov 2, 4:28*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/1/2010 10:31 PM, bert wrote:

We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

Snarf

--
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so" *- Mark Twain

Way over your pea brain TreBert

On Nov 2, 1:31*am, bert wrote:
We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

Simple equastion is space energy is gravity,and like a circle in a
circle (wheel within a wheel) it created the big bang,and that means
the universe and us TreBedrt

On Nov 1, 10:31*pm, bert wrote:
We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

1) there is no missing mass, because if anything it's at the very
least ten fold greater mass than estimated as is, if not 1e3 times
greater.

2) According to Einstein and Hubble worshipers, we and the space
around us is already moving at near -c in relation to those most
distant galaxies that we can detect thus far, and JWST is likely going
to expand on that range and cosmic mass accounting within the year.

3) so what the hell are you talking about? and what under any
circumstances does it matter one way or another?

4) in another couple thousand years there will likely be hardly if any
sign of surviving humans, at least not on this energy, mineral and
food depleted Eden/Earth that we're currently doing pretty much
everything we can muster in order to traumatize and/or destroy it
faster than mother nature or whatever asteroid encounters can manage
to accomplish.

Greenland is currently losing 2%/century of its glacial ice loading,
and each global warming century is likely to double that rate unless
something like our moon gets utilized to block 3% of the solar
energy. Antarctica is losing roughly twice again as much ice-loading
as Greenland, not to mention the global erosion of top-soils, rock,
muds and assorted volcanic ash at perhaps averaging a million tonnes
per second that's also going into the drink, as well as the coastal
bedrock of Greenland could eventually rise by 1 km and thereby easily
displacing another 5 thousand km3.

Gee whiz, with 24 billion folks to feed, and WW3 to survive as well
as pay for, what could possibly go wrong?

~ BG

On Nov 3, 9:37*am, bert wrote:
On Nov 2, 1:31*am, bert wrote:

We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

Simple equastion is space energy is gravity,and like a circle in a
circle (wheel within a wheel) it created the big bang,and that means
the universe and us *TreBedrt

So, when has it reverse?

Are you suggesting that forever expanding out into nothing is some
kind of new and improved voodoo physics that we need to be aware of?

The Eden/Earth version of our human species will be lucky to survive
0.0001% of the cosmic inflation cycle of even 15 billion years.
Basically 15000 years since the end of the last ice age (11712 years
ago) is going to be about it for our species, but only if we're lucky
enough to not blow ourselves up and or vaporize ourselves first.

~ BG

On 11/3/2010 9:37 AM, bert wrote:


Simple equastion is space energy is gravity,and like a circle in a
circle (wheel within a wheel) it created the big bang,and that means
the universe and us TreBedrt


You're stupid.

No offense.




Have a nice day! :-)

On Nov 1, 10:31*pm, bert wrote:
We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

1) there is no missing cosmic mass, because if anything it's at the
very least ten fold greater mass than estimated as is, if not 1e3
times greater.

2) According to Einstein and Hubble worshipers and obfuscation
wizards, we and the space around us is already moving at near -c in
relation to those most distant galaxies that we can detect thus far,
and JWST is likely going to expand on that range and cosmic mass
accounting within the year.

3) so what the hell are you and others talking about whatever missing
mass? and what under any circumstances does it matter one way or
another?

4) in another couple thousand years there will likely be hardly if any
sign of surviving humans, at least not on this energy, mineral and
food depleted Eden/Earth that we're currently doing pretty much
everything we can muster in order to traumatize and/or destroy it
faster than mother nature or whatever asteroid encounters can manage
to accomplish.

Greenland is currently losing 2%/century of its glacial ice loading,
and each global warming century is likely to double that rate unless
something like our moon gets utilized to block 3.5% of the solar
energy. Antarctica is losing roughly twice again as much ice-loading
as Greenland, not to mention the global erosion of top-soils, rock,
muds and assorted volcanic ash at perhaps averaging a million tonnes
per second that's also going into the drink, as well as the coastal
bedrock of Greenland could eventually rise by 1 km and thereby easily
displacing another 510 thousand km3.

Gee whiz, with 24 billion folks to feed, and WW3 to survive as well
as pay for, what could possibly go wrong?

The Eden/Earth version of our human species will be lucky to survive
0.0001% of the cosmic inflation cycle of even 15 billion years.
Basically 15000 years since the end of the last ice age (11712 years
ago) is going to be about it for our species, but only if we're lucky
enough to not blow ourselves up and or vaporize ourselves before the
next 2300 years runs out.

There used to be an old-growth forest on Greenland. Thanks to climate
changes and those Vikings, plus a few others that systematically
trashed another realm of a critical global biodiversity sector that’s
long gone and unlikely to ever get reestablished as old-growth (100+
year old stock) regardless of how much ice goes away. For one thing,
there’s hardly any original topsoil on Greenland. Currently there’s
roughly 2 km2 of forested land (2e4 trees), and that would vanish
within a year if used for local construction and heating. As that ice
melts back and millions of top-soil tonnes are brought in, there’s a
good chance of restarting a hybrid or genetically reengineered forest
from scratch for roughly $1000/tree, making the 50 year mature tree
worth $6K each, and the 100 year tree worth $10K each.

On another related topic of terrestrial energy and its all-inclusive
cost;
You do realize that the BP blowout and their subsequent toxins
released and otherwise contributed represent less than 2% of that kind
of annual average global pollution tonnage, plus those billions of
cubic meters worth of raw methane gas and many other types of vapor
pollution that’s going into the oceans, atmosphere and otherwise onto
land (possibly BPs blowout is worth as little as 1% of the global
average/year). As another hydrocarbon industry contribution is 99% of
helium is either directly lost and/or passes directly through whatever
end-use, and basically escapes to space. Obviously you and most
others here do not have a clue, whereas everything which comes out of
the ground ends up in our surface, ocean and atmospheric environments,
and that the bulk of that extracted substance (dozens of minerals,
heavy and radioactive elements, hydrocarbons and various gasses) that
are processed and made into stuff are essentially toxic, much less do
you really care about what’s coming next.

Now we’re being told that it’s going to cost us $40B to clean up that
BP blowout fiasco.

~ BG

On Nov 3, 9:37*am, bert wrote:
On Nov 2, 1:31*am, bert wrote:

We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

Simple equastion is space energy is gravity,and like a circle in a
circle (wheel within a wheel) it created the big bang,and that means
the universe and us *TreBedrt

So, when has it reversed on us?

Are you suggesting that forever expanding out into nothing is some
kind of new and improved voodoo physics that we need to be aware of?

The Eden/Earth version of our human species will be lucky to survive
0.0001% of the cosmic inflation cycle of even 15 billion years.
Basically 15000 years since the end of the last ice age (11712 years
ago) is going to be about it for our species, but only if we're lucky
enough to not blow ourselves up and or vaporize ourselves first.

~ BG

On Nov 1, 9:31*pm, bert wrote:
We now know space has energy We know accelerating motion creates
greater inertia. We know inertia and gravity are two sides to the same
coin.(equivelant) *So my latest theory on gravity is its the
accelerating space energy that creates greater gravitation,and is the
answer to the 90% missing gravity. It also is the reason my concave&
convex curve of space is on the money. * Kind of far out thinking,but
that is type of thinking needed *This shows also gravity needs no
waves * *TreBert

1) there is no missing cosmic mass (it’s just spread out further than
anyone expected), because if anything our known universe is worth the
very least ten fold greater mass than estimated as is, if not 1e3
times greater.

2) According to Einstein and Hubble worshipers and obfuscation
wizards, we and the space around us is already moving at near -c in
relation to those most distant galaxies that we can detect thus far,
and JWST is likely going to expand on that range and cosmic mass
accounting within the year.

3) so what the hell are you and others talking about whatever missing
mass? and what under any circumstances does it matter one way or
another?

~ BG