![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at
cleardarksky.com? How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? I know, I know, give me a break, its cloudy, I'm bored. Matt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It says somewhere in the site that the accuracy is about 15 kms IIRC.
I find it's quite accurate the vast majority of the time. Todd http://www.backyardastronomy.com http://www.skynewsmagazine.com http://www.simpleastrophotography.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Simmons wrote in message . ..
Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? I know, I know, give me a break, its cloudy, I'm bored. Matt CSC uses the Canadian weather model, one of several in use. CSC is reasonably accurate for a 10-mile diamater centered on the listed latitude and longitude found at the very bottom of the page under "techno-geek" stuff. I'd say the forecast for the absence or presence of clouds is 80-90% accurate, the transparency forecast is about 65% accurate and the seeing forecast is about 80% accurate. That's for Northern California. I've used CSC for several years - even before Attilla Danko created the "clocks" from the forecast. Clear skies, Shneor Sherman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Simmons wrote in message . ..
Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? I know, I know, give me a break, its cloudy, I'm bored. Matt I think it's pretty accurate. It has gotten to the point where if I see a lot of dark blue I have trouble sleeping at night. To see what happens away from the specific local, just click on the squares and it gives you the whole map for that time. Steve O. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Simmons" wrote in message news ![]() Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? I know, I know, give me a break, its cloudy, I'm bored. Matt Oh yeah, so accurate in fact I'm considering giving up on ever doing astronomy in Alberta!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Simmons wrote in message . ..
Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? I know, I know, give me a break, its cloudy, I'm bored. FWIW, I examine 3-4 sites flanking whatever site for which I'm interested in knowing its sky conditions. When I intend to view from my backyard, for example, I examine all of: http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/EwellObCAkey.html http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/StanfordCAkey.html http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/Montebello_CAkey.html == me == http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/SrtgaCAkey.html http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/SanJoseCAkey.html http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/OkrdgObCAkey.html http://www.cleardarksky.com/c/MtHamCAkey.html Even then, I still examine AWS and other weather sites for there are times when ClearDarkSky reports my skies are clear yet simply looking up outside shows total cloud cover over N. California. If your skies are clear, one should examine: http://orbit35i.nesdis.noaa.gov/arad/fpdt/tifcsts.html for its Clear Air Turbulence report; I find the 6-hour view to be the most useful for me. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Simmons" wrote in message
news ![]() Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? I know, I know, give me a break, its cloudy, I'm bored. Matt It can be pretty accurate. I once got a report that said it would be clear until 11pm, and then cloudy until 3am. Sure enough, at 11pm, the clouds rolled in, and most people at the site went home. Instead, I went back to my car and took a nap until 3am, at which time it was perfectly clear again. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Simmons wrote in message . ..
Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? About as accurate or inaccurate as any other weather report. Certainly a useful tool, but don't take it as gospel. How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? That depends on your location. In a place where weather is governed by topography, like the California coast, one site can have has fog 90% of the time while another site two miles away is clear 90% of the time. Where I live, weather is mostly a matter of air masses, and it is pretty imponderable exactly where the boundary between cool clear air and humid hazy air will lie six hours in the future. That is why I never use the Clear Sky Clocks, but instead go to the underlying http://www.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/htmls/mainpage.html, which shows maps rather than point forecasts. Then if I see that it is forecast to be clear where I am but cloudy 30 miles to the west, I can take the forecast with a grain of salt. But if I see that it is forecast to be clear over my whole area, it is probably reliable. - Tony Flanders |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Flanders" wrote in message ... Matt Simmons wrote in message . .. Does anyone know the accuracy of the Clear Sky Clocks at cleardarksky.com? About as accurate or inaccurate as any other weather report. Certainly a useful tool, but don't take it as gospel. How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? That depends on your location. In a place where weather is governed by topography, like the California coast, one site can have has fog 90% of the time while another site two miles away is clear 90% of the time. Where I live, weather is mostly a matter of air masses, and it is pretty imponderable exactly where the boundary between cool clear air and humid hazy air will lie six hours in the future. That is why I never use the Clear Sky Clocks, but instead go to the underlying http://www.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/htmls/mainpage.html, which shows maps rather than point forecasts. Then if I see that it is forecast to be clear where I am but cloudy 30 miles to the west, I can take the forecast with a grain of salt. But if I see that it is forecast to be clear over my whole area, it is probably reliable. - Tony Flanders yep..Canada kicks ass in this particular mode of forecasting . Too bad in Alberta is has become downright scary to look at 80% of the time!! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Flanders wrote:
How far away from a listed site is the reading still accurate and at what rate does the accuracy diminish? That depends on your location. In a place where weather is governed by topography, like the California coast, one site can have has fog 90% of the time while another site two miles away is clear 90% of the time. Correct, Tony! The weather can change quite a bit in a few miles. The Mount Wilson Clear Sky Clock is a case in point. The particular speck of land used for that forecast includes the observatory at 5700 feet and the valley floor almost 5000 feet below but just a few miles horizontal distance. When the fog you refer to comes into the valleys your location on that topography affects your observing conditions quite a bit! Mike Simmons |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Operating systems used in spacecraft? | Grem | Technology | 66 | December 9th 03 01:10 AM |
clear sky clock designers | Mick | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 18th 03 07:55 PM |
Some crow, and a request for help. DSC's and improving accuracy... | Tom T. | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 30th 03 03:55 PM |
Clear Sky Clock Support | WayneH | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | July 17th 03 05:52 AM |