#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Arp 222
Arp 222 is NGC 7727, a very disturbed spiral classed as SAB(s)a pec by
NED, S(B)a pec by the NGC project and a mess by me. Arp included it under galaxies with amorphous spiral arms. It is very similar to Arp 223 as well as near it in western Aquarius. But is only about half as far away at 70 light years. Like Arp 223 it has a nearby companion at about the same distance, NGC 7724 to its west. It is classed as (R')SB(r)b pec? by NED and Sb by the NGC project. The arms do make a near ring but no where as nice as that of Arp 223's companion. I'm stumped as to why NED considers it possible peculiar other than the near ring like arm structure. Since that is fairly common I don't see that as peculiar. NED shows it to be 73 light years distant but that's well within the error bar of red shift distance measurement so which is really closer to us is pretty much a coin toss. Notes at NED indicate it is likely the result of a merger as two nuclei are seen. Looking at my image at 3x I see a red object due east of the main core and a white object to the north northwest. The later may be a star as it appears a bit sharper. One note says it is 3" from the main one but doesn't give a direction. That would be the north northeast object. The note says it could be just a star as their resolution of 0.7" (better than mine at 1") wasn't sufficient to tell. If they can't I certainly can't. Still it does have the appearance of a merger so I'll go with that for now. The galaxy seems to have a near vertical axis and a near horizontal one. That and its style of distortion matches known mergers such as Arp 192 leads me to this conclusion. Arp is of no help having made no comment on either 222 or 223. Since this area is so little studied I never thought to check out Hubble until I was just about to post this. When I did I found a image of the core that clearly shows this is a merger in progress and that northern object is the second core, a much smaller one than the main one, likely because it has been stripped of most of its stars by the merger. So the merger idea appears correct. I've included this Hubble image. It also shows my red patch is just a loop of stars torn out by the merger process. While NGC 7724 is nearby it shows no distortion so I doubt it is interacting with Arp 222. This is also the conclusion of the NGC project and several notes at NED. Still it is an interesting galaxy in an otherwise rather drab image. The colors of both are rather weak with both being rather white in color, not a lot of star formation going on in either it would seem. There's little information on what few galaxies there are in the image. The only other galaxy of note is the small two armed (very faint arms) barred spiral in the lower left corner, 2MASX J23405811-1223374 at about 900 million light years. There are two asteroids in the image. The one at the top directly above Arp 222 is (152825) 1999 UE49 at magnitude 19.1. It is moving virtually directly west. In the lower part of the image well east (left) of center is (106135) 2000 TE42 at magnitude 18.7. It is moving at a steeply inclined angle to the southwest. Arp's image: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp222.jpeg 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick I'll be speaking at the Midstates Region Astronomical League convention the first weekend in June along with Dr. Pete Shultz who designed the Deep Impact impacter and Larry Stepp who headed the optics team that designed the 2 Gemini scopes and NASA's Rob Landis among others. Pete and I helped form the club hosting the convention back in 1961. http://www.msral2010.info/ -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Arp 222
that's a very nice image Rick
The pair look great I am especially interested in the core merger. Congrats in advance on your speaking engagement. I wish I could attend, hear the talk and meet you "Rick Johnson" wrote in message . com... Arp 222 is NGC 7727, a very disturbed spiral classed as SAB(s)a pec by NED, S(B)a pec by the NGC project and a mess by me. Arp included it under galaxies with amorphous spiral arms. It is very similar to Arp 223 as well as near it in western Aquarius. But is only about half as far away at 70 light years. Like Arp 223 it has a nearby companion at about the same distance, NGC 7724 to its west. It is classed as (R')SB(r)b pec? by NED and Sb by the NGC project. The arms do make a near ring but no where as nice as that of Arp 223's companion. I'm stumped as to why NED considers it possible peculiar other than the near ring like arm structure. Since that is fairly common I don't see that as peculiar. NED shows it to be 73 light years distant but that's well within the error bar of red shift distance measurement so which is really closer to us is pretty much a coin toss. Notes at NED indicate it is likely the result of a merger as two nuclei are seen. Looking at my image at 3x I see a red object due east of the main core and a white object to the north northwest. The later may be a star as it appears a bit sharper. One note says it is 3" from the main one but doesn't give a direction. That would be the north northeast object. The note says it could be just a star as their resolution of 0.7" (better than mine at 1") wasn't sufficient to tell. If they can't I certainly can't. Still it does have the appearance of a merger so I'll go with that for now. The galaxy seems to have a near vertical axis and a near horizontal one. That and its style of distortion matches known mergers such as Arp 192 leads me to this conclusion. Arp is of no help having made no comment on either 222 or 223. Since this area is so little studied I never thought to check out Hubble until I was just about to post this. When I did I found a image of the core that clearly shows this is a merger in progress and that northern object is the second core, a much smaller one than the main one, likely because it has been stripped of most of its stars by the merger. So the merger idea appears correct. I've included this Hubble image. It also shows my red patch is just a loop of stars torn out by the merger process. While NGC 7724 is nearby it shows no distortion so I doubt it is interacting with Arp 222. This is also the conclusion of the NGC project and several notes at NED. Still it is an interesting galaxy in an otherwise rather drab image. The colors of both are rather weak with both being rather white in color, not a lot of star formation going on in either it would seem. There's little information on what few galaxies there are in the image. The only other galaxy of note is the small two armed (very faint arms) barred spiral in the lower left corner, 2MASX J23405811-1223374 at about 900 million light years. There are two asteroids in the image. The one at the top directly above Arp 222 is (152825) 1999 UE49 at magnitude 19.1. It is moving virtually directly west. In the lower part of the image well east (left) of center is (106135) 2000 TE42 at magnitude 18.7. It is moving at a steeply inclined angle to the southwest. Arp's image: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp222.jpeg 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick I'll be speaking at the Midstates Region Astronomical League convention the first weekend in June along with Dr. Pete Shultz who designed the Deep Impact impacter and Larry Stepp who headed the optics team that designed the 2 Gemini scopes and NASA's Rob Landis among others. Pete and I helped form the club hosting the convention back in 1961. http://www.msral2010.info/ -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Arp 222
Excellant image - I've added it to the target list.
On Sun, 16 May 2010 17:45:23 -0500, Rick Johnson wrote: Arp 222 is NGC 7727, a very disturbed spiral classed as SAB(s)a pec by NED, S(B)a pec by the NGC project and a mess by me. Arp included it under galaxies with amorphous spiral arms. It is very similar to Arp 223 as well as near it in western Aquarius. But is only about half as far away at 70 light years. Like Arp 223 it has a nearby companion at about the same distance, NGC 7724 to its west. It is classed as (R')SB(r)b pec? by NED and Sb by the NGC project. The arms do make a near ring but no where as nice as that of Arp 223's companion. I'm stumped as to why NED considers it possible peculiar other than the near ring like arm structure. Since that is fairly common I don't see that as peculiar. NED shows it to be 73 light years distant but that's well within the error bar of red shift distance measurement so which is really closer to us is pretty much a coin toss. Notes at NED indicate it is likely the result of a merger as two nuclei are seen. Looking at my image at 3x I see a red object due east of the main core and a white object to the north northwest. The later may be a star as it appears a bit sharper. One note says it is 3" from the main one but doesn't give a direction. That would be the north northeast object. The note says it could be just a star as their resolution of 0.7" (better than mine at 1") wasn't sufficient to tell. If they can't I certainly can't. Still it does have the appearance of a merger so I'll go with that for now. The galaxy seems to have a near vertical axis and a near horizontal one. That and its style of distortion matches known mergers such as Arp 192 leads me to this conclusion. Arp is of no help having made no comment on either 222 or 223. Since this area is so little studied I never thought to check out Hubble until I was just about to post this. When I did I found a image of the core that clearly shows this is a merger in progress and that northern object is the second core, a much smaller one than the main one, likely because it has been stripped of most of its stars by the merger. So the merger idea appears correct. I've included this Hubble image. It also shows my red patch is just a loop of stars torn out by the merger process. While NGC 7724 is nearby it shows no distortion so I doubt it is interacting with Arp 222. This is also the conclusion of the NGC project and several notes at NED. Still it is an interesting galaxy in an otherwise rather drab image. The colors of both are rather weak with both being rather white in color, not a lot of star formation going on in either it would seem. There's little information on what few galaxies there are in the image. The only other galaxy of note is the small two armed (very faint arms) barred spiral in the lower left corner, 2MASX J23405811-1223374 at about 900 million light years. There are two asteroids in the image. The one at the top directly above Arp 222 is (152825) 1999 UE49 at magnitude 19.1. It is moving virtually directly west. In the lower part of the image well east (left) of center is (106135) 2000 TE42 at magnitude 18.7. It is moving at a steeply inclined angle to the southwest. Arp's image: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp222.jpeg 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick I'll be speaking at the Midstates Region Astronomical League convention the first weekend in June along with Dr. Pete Shultz who designed the Deep Impact impacter and Larry Stepp who headed the optics team that designed the 2 Gemini scopes and NASA's Rob Landis among others. Pete and I helped form the club hosting the convention back in 1961. http://www.msral2010.info/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTRO: Arp 222
Rick,
this galaxy is larger than one would expect from such an unknown object, at least if one is able to go as deep as you did. Stefan "Rick Johnson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag . com... Arp 222 is NGC 7727, a very disturbed spiral classed as SAB(s)a pec by NED, S(B)a pec by the NGC project and a mess by me. Arp included it under galaxies with amorphous spiral arms. It is very similar to Arp 223 as well as near it in western Aquarius. But is only about half as far away at 70 light years. Like Arp 223 it has a nearby companion at about the same distance, NGC 7724 to its west. It is classed as (R')SB(r)b pec? by NED and Sb by the NGC project. The arms do make a near ring but no where as nice as that of Arp 223's companion. I'm stumped as to why NED considers it possible peculiar other than the near ring like arm structure. Since that is fairly common I don't see that as peculiar. NED shows it to be 73 light years distant but that's well within the error bar of red shift distance measurement so which is really closer to us is pretty much a coin toss. Notes at NED indicate it is likely the result of a merger as two nuclei are seen. Looking at my image at 3x I see a red object due east of the main core and a white object to the north northwest. The later may be a star as it appears a bit sharper. One note says it is 3" from the main one but doesn't give a direction. That would be the north northeast object. The note says it could be just a star as their resolution of 0.7" (better than mine at 1") wasn't sufficient to tell. If they can't I certainly can't. Still it does have the appearance of a merger so I'll go with that for now. The galaxy seems to have a near vertical axis and a near horizontal one. That and its style of distortion matches known mergers such as Arp 192 leads me to this conclusion. Arp is of no help having made no comment on either 222 or 223. Since this area is so little studied I never thought to check out Hubble until I was just about to post this. When I did I found a image of the core that clearly shows this is a merger in progress and that northern object is the second core, a much smaller one than the main one, likely because it has been stripped of most of its stars by the merger. So the merger idea appears correct. I've included this Hubble image. It also shows my red patch is just a loop of stars torn out by the merger process. While NGC 7724 is nearby it shows no distortion so I doubt it is interacting with Arp 222. This is also the conclusion of the NGC project and several notes at NED. Still it is an interesting galaxy in an otherwise rather drab image. The colors of both are rather weak with both being rather white in color, not a lot of star formation going on in either it would seem. There's little information on what few galaxies there are in the image. The only other galaxy of note is the small two armed (very faint arms) barred spiral in the lower left corner, 2MASX J23405811-1223374 at about 900 million light years. There are two asteroids in the image. The one at the top directly above Arp 222 is (152825) 1999 UE49 at magnitude 19.1. It is moving virtually directly west. In the lower part of the image well east (left) of center is (106135) 2000 TE42 at magnitude 18.7. It is moving at a steeply inclined angle to the southwest. Arp's image: http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level...ig_arp222.jpeg 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick I'll be speaking at the Midstates Region Astronomical League convention the first weekend in June along with Dr. Pete Shultz who designed the Deep Impact impacter and Larry Stepp who headed the optics team that designed the 2 Gemini scopes and NASA's Rob Landis among others. Pete and I helped form the club hosting the convention back in 1961. http://www.msral2010.info/ -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | April 12th 07 01:05 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |