Congratulations President Obama....America's Finest Hour!

In article
,
Ramon F Herrera wrote:

On Mar 25, 10:09*pm, Sage2 wrote:
The slave owner is neither a Southern white boy
nor a " negro " but a non citizen mulatto with
muslim beliefs and a hate for both his new found
slaves and the very country he pretentiously leads.

Here, ladies and gents, we have yet another evidence of an
incontrovertible fact, so glaring that one must be blind (real or
pretend) to try to deny it:

In the USA all expressions of hate towards whole classes of human
beings (not towards ideas!) comes from the right.

The above is specially true on the Internet.

-Ramon


WRONG!!!! All you have to do is log onto the "alt.politics" newsgroups,
where you will regularly encounter terms like "repugtards," "repugs,"
"repubiKKKans," etc.

Some of the most vitriolic posters are on the Left.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

On Mar 26, 11:35*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Ramon F Herrera wrote:



On Mar 25, 10:09*pm, Sage2 wrote:
* The slave owner is neither a Southern white boy
* nor a " negro " but a non citizen mulatto with
* muslim beliefs and a hate for both his new found
* slaves and the very country he pretentiously leads.


Here, ladies and gents, we have yet another evidence of an
incontrovertible fact, so glaring that one must be blind
(real or pretend) to try to deny it:

In the USA all expressions of hate towards whole classes
of human beings (not towards ideas!) comes from the right.

The above is specially true on the Internet.

-Ramon

WRONG!!!! *All you have to do is log onto the "alt.politics"
newsgroups, where you will regularly encounter terms like
"repugtards," "repugs," "repubiKKKans," etc.

Some of the most vitriolic posters are on the Left.



(Ramon rubbing hands like the witch of Oz)

Ohhhh, my pretty....

You naively fell into the trap that I carefully crafted. Since I feel
specially generous -what with being Friday afternoon and all- I am
going to give you one more chance to read what I stated.

Your argument will be converted to pulp afterwards...

-Ramon

In article
,
Ramon F Herrera wrote:

On Mar 26, 11:35*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Ramon F Herrera wrote:



On Mar 25, 10:09*pm, Sage2 wrote:
* The slave owner is neither a Southern white boy
* nor a " negro " but a non citizen mulatto with
* muslim beliefs and a hate for both his new found
* slaves and the very country he pretentiously leads.


Here, ladies and gents, we have yet another evidence of an
incontrovertible fact, so glaring that one must be blind
(real or pretend) to try to deny it:

In the USA all expressions of hate towards whole classes
of human beings (not towards ideas!) comes from the right.

The above is specially true on the Internet.

-Ramon

WRONG!!!! *All you have to do is log onto the "alt.politics"
newsgroups, where you will regularly encounter terms like
"repugtards," "repugs," "repubiKKKans," etc.

Some of the most vitriolic posters are on the Left.



(Ramon rubbing hands like the witch of Oz)

Ohhhh, my pretty....

You naively fell into the trap that I carefully crafted. Since I feel
specially generous -what with being Friday afternoon and all- I am
going to give you one more chance to read what I stated.

Your argument will be converted to pulp afterwards...

-Ramon

Well, Ramon -- you obviously have a very short attention span and
selective memory. You do not remember all of the "hate Bush" slime that
permeated the Web during his terms in office, nor do you recognize that
the "progressives" (read: "oppressives") are the modern equivalent of
slave owners. THe welfare state is designed to promote dependence on
government, rather than individual responsibility.

1. They are elitists who believe that everybody should follow THEIR
"wisdom."
2. They wish to eliminate individual choice and freedom.
3. They believe that only government has the answers to all of our
problems.
4. They wish to make automatons of the "people of lesser intellect" than
themselves.
5. They cannot recognize the fact that nobody, or group of
"intelligentsia" has the foresight and knowledge to predict or manage a
modern economy. They fail to understand that a modern economy more
resembles an enlightened anarchy than anything they can imagine as a
planned economy.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news

1. They are...

2. They wish ...
..
3. They believe...

5. They cannot...

They fail....


'We' have our 25% lunatic fringe just like you.

And only by having the two lunatic opposite extremes
hash it out can a sane middle be found. McCain
lost so badly to Obama because he thought by
straddling the fence he could attract both sides
to vote for him. But moderate is uninspiring and
more likely to just make enemies with both sides.

Instead of putting forth a candidate that's just
an average of the two so to speak, they should
find someone that represents the fringe of both
sides at once. A Bush on foreign policy that's
a Kennedy on social issues so to speak. Instead
of an average of the two, combine both extremes
into one. With the idea that the range generated
allows every voter to find something they like.

Uncertainty is a natural attractor, which helped
Obama win the White House. The less something
defines itself, the more the observer can see
what they want.

Aside from being undefined, there are only two other ways
of creating that uncertainty. By an average of the two, or by
combining the extremes of each side. But they should do that
with a single candidate, not just by using the VP as in
Obama/Biden, McCain/Palin.



s








--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.