![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It seems to me the greatest single flaw in our space program has been the habit of putting the cart before the horse. "If we build it they will come". A purpose will somehow find it's way to any work space we put in orbit. Or even a colony. Like a business plan entitled "Keeping our Fingers Crossed". But if it takes so long to build something like the ISS, or a colony somewhere, how can we possibly know if the original purpose is still relevant decades later when the hardware is finally built? And when it comes to profit-minded space goals, like mining some colony. The time lag is even more destructive. The final product of a space program must find the optimum between maximizing generic usefulness and minimizing time to completion. In a market system the solution would be to pick a widely useful commodity that is most likely to remain valuable into the future. What commodity ...from space.. has almost universal applications? While clearly growing in need and value over time? And the appropriate hardware can be completed in Apollo like time frames? Energy, of course! There's only one goal for NASA that fits like a glove. That can connect space flight to one of the largest and most vital markets on the planet, and in a practical way. All that, while having a nice little spin-off called.... SAVING THE WORLD! Jonathan Laying the Foundation for Space Solar Power http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10202&page=1 Space-Based Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Security http://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/nsso.htm Space Energy Inc http://www.spaceenergy.com/s/Default.htm War Without Oil: A Catalyst For True Transformation "Complicating the matter is a lack of professional consensus on the actual expected date of global peak oil production, with credible organizations such a ExxonMobil predicting that the non-OPEC Hubbert's Peak will arrive within 5 years and the U.S. Government claiming the planet's absolute peak will occur somewhere around 2037" http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cst/csat56.pdf s |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What We Do we make a living by what we get. We make a life by what wegive. &Winston Churchill .visit us at | ali khanbaba | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 31st 09 05:05 PM |
Keith Cowing on microgravity research | Jeff Findley | Policy | 18 | June 30th 06 07:11 PM |