![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 9:52�pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
� � �Cough......cough!! NY Times.com China Leading Global Race to Make Clean Energy "Coal will still represent two-thirds of China's capacity in 2020" "China's biggest advantage may be its domestic demand for electricity, rising 15 percent a year. To meet demand in the coming decade, according to statistics from the International Energy Agency, China will need to add nearly nine times as much electricity generation capacity as the United �States will."http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew... � � COUGH!!! Laying the Foundation for Space Solar Powerhttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10202&page=1 Space-Based Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Securityhttp://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/nsso.htm Space Energy Inchttp://www.spaceenergy.com/s/Default.htm War Without Oil: A Catalyst For True Transformation "Complicating the matter is a lack of professional consensus on the actual expected date of global peak oil production, with credible organizations such a ExxonMobil predicting that the non-OPEC Hubbert's Peak will arrive within 5 years and the U.S. Government claiming the planet's absolute peak will occur somewhere around 2037"http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cst/csat56.pdf s US has technology for coal to gasoline, which could free us of imported oil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bob haller safety advocate" wrote in message ... On Mar 4, 9:52�pm, "Jonathan" wrote: � � �Cough......cough!! NY Times.com China Leading Global Race to Make Clean Energy "Coal will still represent two-thirds of China's capacity in 2020" "China's biggest advantage may be its domestic demand for electricity, rising 15 percent a year. To meet demand in the coming decade, according to statistics from the International Energy Agency, China will need to add nearly nine times as much electricity generation capacity as the United �States will."http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew... � � COUGH!!! Laying the Foundation for Space Solar Powerhttp://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10202&page=1 Space-Based Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Securityhttp://www.nss.org/settlement/ssp/library/nsso.htm Space Energy Inchttp://www.spaceenergy.com/s/Default.htm War Without Oil: A Catalyst For True Transformation "Complicating the matter is a lack of professional consensus on the actual expected date of global peak oil production, with credible organizations such a ExxonMobil predicting that the non-OPEC Hubbert's Peak will arrive within 5 years and the U.S. Government claiming the planet's absolute peak will occur somewhere around 2037"http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cst/csat56.pdf s US has technology for coal to gasoline, which could free us of imported oil .. .. Americans are not motivated about energy. Carter tried to open the subject with American...Reagan dropped the ball and we allowed 30 years to be wasted. Americans are still not awake regarding energy... Lulled by the oil industry and their stooges we go our merry way |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 9:52*pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
* * *Cough......cough!! NY Times.com China Leading Global Race to Make Clean Energy "Coal will still represent two-thirds of China's capacity in 2020" "China's biggest advantage may be its domestic demand for electricity, rising 15 percent a year. To meet demand in the coming decade, according to statistics from the International Energy Agency, China will need to add nearly nine times as much electricity generation capacity as the United *States will."http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew... And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal burning. Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of the U.S. and Europe? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 6:01*am, Get lost wrote:
On Mar 4, 9:52*pm, "Jonathan" wrote: * * *Cough......cough!! NY Times.com China Leading Global Race to Make Clean Energy "Coal will still represent two-thirds of China's capacity in 2020" "China's biggest advantage may be its domestic demand for electricity, rising 15 percent a year. To meet demand in the coming decade, according to statistics from the International Energy Agency, China will need to add nearly nine times as much electricity generation capacity as the United *States will."http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew... And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal burning. *Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of the U.S. and Europe? Because Chinese intellectuals and scientists not fully programmed by years of propaganda, so they know the 'science' is mostly hand-waving eco-hysterical terror-isn'tisms. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get lost wrote:
On Mar 4, 9:52 pm, "Jonathan" wrote: Cough......cough!! NY Times.com China Leading Global Race to Make Clean Energy "Coal will still represent two-thirds of China's capacity in 2020" "China's biggest advantage may be its domestic demand for electricity, rising 15 percent a year. To meet demand in the coming decade, according to statistics from the International Energy Agency, China will need to add nearly nine times as much electricity generation capacity as the United States will."http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew... And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal burning. Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of the U.S. and Europe? Because the Chinese would lock them up in a hurry. They are not about to let a fringe group tell them what to do. Like we seem to be doing in America right now........ -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net http://www.novac.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 5:56*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Get lost wrote: : :And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal :burning. *Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of :the U.S. and Europe? : Because they know China will ignore them. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn translation, America cannot lead, we must follow the least common denominator argument (WRONG). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 5:04*am, AM wrote:"Because the Chinese
would lock them up in a hurry. They are not about to let a fringe group tell them what to do. Like we seem to be doing in America right now........" i seem to remember a place called tiananmen square, what kind of place do you want america to be? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 7:00*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: :On Mar 4, 5:56 am, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Get lost wrote: : : : : :And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal : :burning. Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of : :the U.S. and Europe? : : : : Because they know China will ignore them. : : :translation, America cannot lead, we must follow the least common :denominator argument (WRONG). : I don't think your translation into gibberish is required. *Most of us speak English. -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine laughing, oh you mean you dont want to understand because it would cause you to rethink your myopic views. On the other hand, you felt necessary to state that a sovereign country would not listen to activists in the U.S., that is great, but not the point. Either the U.S. will lead in making the reductions, or we will be dragged down by the argument that if no one else makes reductions than we shouldn’t (leas common denominator). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred J. McCall wrote:
columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: :On Mar 4, 5:56 am, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Get lost wrote: : : : : :And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal : :burning. Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of : :the U.S. and Europe? : : : : Because they know China will ignore them. : : :translation, America cannot lead, we must follow the least common :denominator argument (WRONG). : I don't think your translation into gibberish is required. Most of us speak English. Please tell us how we can convince the Chinese to stop building coal fired power plants, and cut back on emissions ? -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net http://www.novac.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 7:19*am, AM wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote: columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: :On Mar 4, 5:56 am, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Get lost wrote: : : : : :And their primary, cheapest and most plentiful source is coal : :burning. *Why don't the global warming scum go after China instead of : :the U.S. and Europe? : : : : Because they know China will ignore them. : : :translation, America cannot lead, we must follow the least common :denominator argument (WRONG). : I don't think your translation into gibberish is required. *Most of us speak English. Please tell us how we can convince the Chinese to stop building coal fired power plants, and cut back on emissions ? -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net http://www.novac.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - pull investments from chinese companies, such as petrochina. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
China 'could reach Moon by 2020' | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 20 | July 31st 08 03:34 PM |
China 'could reach Moon by 2020' | Agent Smith | Policy | 29 | July 22nd 08 07:23 PM |
China 'could reach Moon by 2020' | Agent Smith | Astronomy Misc | 34 | July 22nd 08 07:23 PM |
China to Moon by 2020 | Steve Dufour | Policy | 6 | December 5th 03 09:33 AM |
China to Moon by 2020 | Steve Dufour | Misc | 2 | December 3rd 03 01:32 AM |