A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LM/LK ascent question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 23rd 10, 02:06 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
David Lesher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default LM/LK ascent question

Pat Flannery writes:

The astronauts take star sightings and feed the info into the Inertial
Measuring Unit to get everything aligned as to the LM's position and
orientation on the Moon's surface: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/aot.htm
So they can indeed update their guidance system to compensate for gyro
drift while on the lunar surface.


I have read Digital Apollo, & the small book on the AGC, and I am
still astonished as to how such a wimpy box could do such complex
calculations; the map data alone must be most of the ROM space.
--
A host is a host from coast to
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
  #2  
Old February 23rd 10, 02:58 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,089
Default LM/LK ascent question

David Lesher wrote:
Pat Flannery writes:

The astronauts take star sightings and feed the info into the Inertial
Measuring Unit to get everything aligned as to the LM's position and
orientation on the Moon's surface: http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/aot.htm
So they can indeed update their guidance system to compensate for gyro
drift while on the lunar surface.


I have read Digital Apollo, & the small book on the AGC, and I am
still astonished as to how such a wimpy box could do such complex
calculations; the map data alone must be most of the ROM space.


Not as much as you might think. There were only 37 stars in the star
map, each of which was defined by a three-dimensional unit vector in
inertial coordinates. Each component of the unit vector was a
double-precision AGC fixed-point number. So the star map was only
(37*3*2) or 222 AGC words.

There was also no full map of the lunar surface. There were stored
landmark coordinates but each one of those was just a unit vector in
moon-fixed coordinates, requiring six words per landmark. For the early
flights, the lunar surface itself was modeled as a sphere with a radius
equal to the landing site vector magnitude. For the later flights, there
was a simple lunar terrain model that consisted of just a few altitude
points uprange of the landing site along the approach path, with linear
interpolation between the points. This model therefore only required a
few words of AGC memory.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LM/LK ascent question Pat Flannery History 42 March 21st 10 04:23 AM
Question re SSME on WB-57 ascent video Frank Space Shuttle 3 September 14th 06 11:31 PM
Astronauts in the ascent Michel Space Shuttle 11 July 30th 06 06:28 PM
Question: Roll During LM Ascent John History 25 July 6th 06 09:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.