![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I do the 4th edition it is going to be quick and easy because all
I have to do is go through the 3rd ed and number the posts as per chapter and then post them in proper order. It is an exercise worried primarily on ordering and not the contents. --- There is another way to evaluate whether our Solar System was created from Dirac Radioactivity or whether the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is true. What we do here is evaluate how much cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays penetrate Earth over a day time period. How much energy and mass is imparted upon Earth in a 24 hour period from that of cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays? And then multiply that by 5 billion years and then multiply it by 10 billion years. Can we create the planet Earth from simply the accrual of cosmic rays and gamma rays. There is a hitch in this calculation in that Jupiter receives much more cosmic rays per day than does Earth so the rate of accrual is variable and not constant. And the rate of accrual depends on the magnetic field of the astro body. So the present Earth mass is 6 x 10^27 grams and there are approx 2.5 x 10^15 minutes in 5 billion years. So what I need is a rate of cosmic ray and cosmic gamma rays of about 2.5 x 10^12 grams per minute. Does Earth or the Sun or Jupiter receive about that much mass per minute from cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays? I am going to have to look up that information but I think it is too high. Gladly I was mistaken. Looking through this website: http://www.int.washington.edu/PHYS55...hapter8_04.pdf They give a figure for Cosmic Ray Intensity at 1/cm^2 sec ,or, 1 ev/ cm^3 They say that most Cosmic Rays, or 90%, are protons and about 9% are helium nuclei. I saw no Intensity figure for Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts on that website. But I think I can get 2.5 x 10^12 grams per minute from the figure 1/ cm^2 sec and then some. So what we see here, is how to create and build Earth from purely just the Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Rays that impact Earth every minute of every day and year. So we never needed a Nebular Dust Cloud to create our Solar System when it can be created purely from the Cosmic rays impacting on the astro bodies of our Solar System. Sadly we were taught in school that Earth and the Sun and planets got their heavy elements in the Nebular Dust Cloud formed from some ancient supernova. So that the gold or platinum or uranium that we find on Earth originated in some supernova explosion. So if our Earth and Solar System was not created from a Nebular Dust Cloud, how did we end up with gold and platinum and uranium found on Earth? Well the Dirac Radioactivity in the form of Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts easily produces the heavier elements. Some Gamma Ray bursts are so energetic that they can create a whole entire rock or insect. Some Gamma Ray bursts have been measured to have 10^17 MeV (if memory is correct) and some years back a Gamma Ray was seen that could incinerate our Solar System if it had bursted near our Solar System. So we are talking about huge amounts of energy. And so a high energy gamma ray burst on Earth could easily transmute a hydrogen or helium or oxygen atom into a uranium atom. So we never needed a Nebular Dust Cloud theory to create our Solar System when all we needed was an accounting of the Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Rays. Now if anyone still believes that the Nebular Dust Cloud theory formed and created and built our Solar System, well, obviously they would have to explain why Earth is not twice as large and twice as massive as it currently is, because if you believe the Nebular Dust Cloud, you are going to have to explain where all that mass from Cosmic Rays and Gamma Rays went in those past 5 billion years. Are you going to say that the Cosmic Rays and Gamma Rays were nonexistant for the past 5 billion years and only recently did they begin to strike Earth. Because at the rate of impact of Cosmic Rays today, gives a Earth of the same size and mass it currently possess. Also, the building of heavier elements via Gamma Ray Bursts makes sense in the fact that the surface of Earth is in large supply of heavier elements. Whereas if the Nebular Dust Cloud theory were true that the surface of Earth would have been depleted via erosion over billions of years so that the surface would have few heavy elements around. So what I need to create and then build Earth over 5 billion years is a flow rate of Cosmic Rays plus Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts of about 2.5 x 10^12 grams per minute which is the same as 2.5 billion kilograms per minute. The Amazon River has a flow rate of 12 billion liters per minute, and keeping in mind that a liter of water is a kilogram of water. So we can have a mental comparison of what we need to replace the Nebular Dust Cloud theory. So is the flow rate of Cosmic Rays plus Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts about on the average of 2.5 billion kilograms per minute, roughly 1/6 of the flow rate of the Amazon River? I would think so, because every lightning bolt that strikes Earth is accompanied or created from a "Cosmic Ray leader strike". So Cosmic Rays are very abundant. And the Amazon River is tiny compared to all of the surface of Earth. So if you want to spread the mouth of the Amazon River over all the surface of Earth then it is rather easy to see that Cosmic Rays plus Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts could easily provide the mass of Earth over 5 billion years. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
chapt4 Dirac's new-radioactivities and Dirac's multiplicative-creation#212 Atom Totality theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 21st 09 02:43 AM |
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 09 08:29 AM |
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 13th 09 04:00 PM |
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 7th 09 07:32 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |