A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

chapt4 Dirac's new-radioactivities #214 Atom Totality theory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 22nd 09, 03:15 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default chapt4 Dirac's new-radioactivities #214 Atom Totality theory

When I do the 4th edition it is going to be quick and easy because all
I have to do is go through the 3rd ed
and number the posts as per chapter and then post them in proper
order. It is an exercise worried primarily
on ordering and not the contents.

---

There is another way to evaluate whether our Solar System was created
from Dirac Radioactivity
or whether the Nebular Dust Cloud theory is true.

What we do here is evaluate how much cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays
penetrate Earth
over a day time period. How much energy and mass is imparted upon
Earth in a 24 hour period
from that of cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays? And then multiply that
by 5 billion years
and then multiply it by 10 billion years. Can we create the planet
Earth from simply the accrual
of cosmic rays and gamma rays.

There is a hitch in this calculation in that Jupiter receives much
more cosmic rays per day than
does Earth so the rate of accrual is variable and not constant. And
the rate of accrual depends
on the magnetic field of the astro body.

So the present Earth mass is 6 x 10^27 grams and there are approx 2.5
x 10^15 minutes in
5 billion years. So what I need is a rate of cosmic ray and cosmic
gamma rays of about
2.5 x 10^12 grams per minute. Does Earth or the Sun or Jupiter receive
about that much
mass per minute from cosmic rays and cosmic gamma rays?
I am going to have to look up that information but I think it is too
high.

Gladly I was mistaken. Looking through this website:
http://www.int.washington.edu/PHYS55...hapter8_04.pdf

They give a figure for Cosmic Ray Intensity at 1/cm^2 sec ,or, 1 ev/
cm^3
They say that most Cosmic Rays, or 90%, are protons and about 9% are
helium nuclei. I saw no Intensity figure for Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts
on
that website.

But I think I can get 2.5 x 10^12 grams per minute from the figure 1/
cm^2 sec
and then some.

So what we see here, is how to create and build Earth from purely just
the
Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Rays that impact Earth every minute of
every day and year. So we never needed a Nebular Dust Cloud to create
our
Solar System when it can be created purely from the Cosmic rays
impacting
on the astro bodies of our Solar System.


Sadly we were taught in school that Earth and the Sun and planets got
their heavy elements in
the Nebular Dust Cloud formed from some ancient supernova. So that the
gold or platinum
or uranium that we find on Earth originated in some supernova
explosion.

So if our Earth and Solar System was not created from a Nebular Dust
Cloud, how did we
end up with gold and platinum and uranium found on Earth? Well the
Dirac Radioactivity in
the form of Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts easily produces
the heavier elements.
Some Gamma Ray bursts are so energetic that they can create a whole
entire rock or insect.
Some Gamma Ray bursts have been measured to have 10^17 MeV (if memory
is correct)
and some years back a Gamma Ray was seen that could incinerate our
Solar System if it
had bursted near our Solar System. So we are talking about huge
amounts of energy.

And so a high energy gamma ray burst on Earth could easily transmute a
hydrogen or helium
or oxygen atom into a uranium atom.

So we never needed a Nebular Dust Cloud theory to create our Solar
System when all we
needed was an accounting of the Cosmic Rays and Cosmic Gamma Rays.

Now if anyone still believes that the Nebular Dust Cloud theory formed
and created and built
our Solar System, well, obviously they would have to explain why Earth
is not twice as large
and twice as massive as it currently is, because if you believe the
Nebular Dust Cloud, you are
going to have to explain where all that mass from Cosmic Rays and
Gamma Rays went in those
past 5 billion years. Are you going to say that the Cosmic Rays and
Gamma Rays were
nonexistant for the past 5 billion years and only recently did they
begin to strike Earth.

Because at the rate of impact of Cosmic Rays today, gives a Earth of
the same size and mass
it currently possess.

Also, the building of heavier elements via Gamma Ray Bursts makes
sense in the fact that the
surface of Earth is in large supply of heavier elements. Whereas if
the Nebular Dust Cloud theory
were true that the surface of Earth would have been depleted via
erosion over billions of years so that
the surface would have few heavy elements around.


So what I need to create and then build Earth over 5 billion years is
a flow rate
of Cosmic Rays plus Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts of about 2.5 x 10^12 grams
per
minute which is the same as 2.5 billion kilograms per minute.

The Amazon River has a flow rate of 12 billion liters per minute, and
keeping in mind
that a liter of water is a kilogram of water. So we can have a mental
comparison of
what we need to replace the Nebular Dust Cloud theory.

So is the flow rate of Cosmic Rays plus Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts about
on the
average of 2.5 billion kilograms per minute, roughly 1/6 of the flow
rate of the Amazon
River?

I would think so, because every lightning bolt that strikes Earth is
accompanied or created
from a "Cosmic Ray leader strike". So Cosmic Rays are very abundant.
And the Amazon
River is tiny compared to all of the surface of Earth. So if you want
to spread the mouth of the
Amazon River over all the surface of Earth then it is rather easy to
see that Cosmic Rays
plus Cosmic Gamma Ray Bursts could easily provide the mass of Earth
over 5 billion years.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
chapt4 Dirac's new-radioactivities and Dirac's multiplicative-creation#212 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 21st 09 02:43 AM
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 6th 09 08:29 AM
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 6 August 13th 09 04:00 PM
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 August 7th 09 07:32 PM
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 2 May 21st 09 07:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.