Anyone else seen this and thourght light pollution?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm

Kev

Kev Lawrence wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm

Kev

More seriously I am inclined to think "Dreamspace" or "Colourspace" and
the ensuing disaster when the wind rips it from its moorings will be
considerably enhanced by the 120m fall to the ground. See.

http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/new...an_acc ident/

Personally I don't have a problem with people writing on the cloudbase
with lasers when the sky is *cloudy*. I do object to them putting beams
into the sky when it is clear (unless for LIDAR scientific work).

Regards,
Martin Brown

Wasn't it Kev Lawrence who wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm

I would have thought that worrying about light pollution in the East End
of London was already a lost cause.

--
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure

"Mike Williams" wrote in message
...
Wasn't it Kev Lawrence who wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8350770.stm

I would have thought that worrying about light pollution in the East End
of London was already a lost cause.

True but we don't want anything that sets a standard do we?

kev