![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 5:56*pm, "Andrew W"
wrote: HVAC wrote: "Andrew W" wrote in message . au... LOL! *This is the same Hoagland that claimed that astronauts had to dodge glass buildings on the moon while landing? You didn't know that photos were routinely airbrushed of all structures? And civilians studying the moon's features with privately owned telescopes... Are they part of this evil conspiracy? I'm not sure what you mean by that. But what I said has been confirmed by ex-insiders. So, not only are you devoid of any humor... Your're also a retard? When its time for humour we'll joke the night away. We're not there yet. Maybe if I explain it as I would to a child. YOU said the moon pictures had Hoagland's 'glass structures' airbrushed out. *I* asked if even all the civilians with telescopes were in on this giant evil airbrushing conspiracy. Is it clear yet Forest? "Airbrush is as airbrush does". Civilians can't see certain parts of the moon which are not visible from earth, like the side facing away for example, so your comment was kind of pointless. That's why I couldn't figure out what you were on about. Science evolves not by believing.... But by disbelieving. That's only one part of the picture. No. It is THE picture. Only as far as you hard liners with no imaginations are concerned. Someone postulates a theory and then it's on. Everyone is invited to tear that theory down. If it can't stand up to close scrutiny, if it can't be repeated, it's discarded for something better. That's theoretical physics science which is very competitive. This is ufo research which is a very different ballgame. I can see that you guys are rigid thinkers who don't understand this very difficult situation because of the nature of our secretive governments and military and can't figure out why the proofs still aren't being released after all these years, so you get all bitchy and angry and take it out on the remaining dedicated researchers who still have the patience to wait for the current govt. structure to crumble. This is an interesting point. "....govt. structure to crumble". Do you honestly think those who pull the strings will relinquish power? Do your investigations foresee a change in the near future? I'm afraid this one is going the distance....... RT PS Are you a full time researcher? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good debunking of "SDI bankrupted USSR" wanted (was Opportunity's Odometer Clocks Over 10 km Mark) | Dale Carlson | History | 5 | February 21st 07 02:06 AM |