What if(on Moon Distance?)

What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? We have to protect high waves from destroying cities
like NYC London etc. We could do it. Bert PS Think New Orleans

On Oct 13, 9:43*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? *We have to protect high waves from destroying cities
like NYC London etc. We could do it. *Bert *PS Think New Orleans

Yes, such as moving our Selene/moon out to Earth L1 would accomplish
moderating those pesky ocean tides to something worth a little less
than half of what we currently have to deal with, and we'd also get
that nifty and badly needed 3.03.5% spot of shade to boot.

~ BG

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ...
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? We have to protect high waves from destroying cities
like NYC London etc. We could do it. Bert PS Think New Orleans


Yeah, it would only take what? The energy of a quadrillion nuclear
bombs to move the moon 1m/s?

The need is not there. Why bother? If we have to move a few
cities that is the consequence of living on a mutable planet.
Remember, a large quantity of the United States was under
water at one point in time, recently.

On Oct 13, 10:39*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ...
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? *We have to protect high waves from destroying cities
like NYC London etc. We could do it. *Bert *PS Think New Orleans

Yeah, it would only take what? *The energy of a quadrillion nuclear
bombs to move the moon 1m/s?

Are all republican Yids as dumbfounded as yourself?


The need is not there. *Why bother? *If we have to move a few
cities that is the consequence of living on a mutable planet.
Remember, a large quantity of the United States was under
water at one point in time, recently.

Your mainstream obfuscation and perpetual denials are noted, and
without your support, Big Energy greed and debauchery wouldn't stand a
chance.

Earth is also ever so gradually shrinking and otherwise losing
considerable mass, as well as the artificial/human assisted erosion
process has accelerated nature by at least 10 fold over the last
couple hundred years, and our rising oceans are not only becoming
devoid of biodiversity and toxin polluted, but also populated by
expanding dead zones that only jellyfish and a few other weird blobs
of life seem to like, whereas natural diatoms as a vast and complex a
global species are pretty much done for.

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message ...
On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ...
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? We have to protect high waves from destroying cities
like NYC London etc. We could do it. Bert PS Think New Orleans

Yeah, it would only take what? The energy of a quadrillion nuclear
bombs to move the moon 1m/s?

Are all republican Yids as dumbfounded as yourself?

Okay, so it won't take that many nukes? What's your answer?
Talk about obfuscation. Either prove it wrong or STFU.

"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in
...

snipperoony GuthBall drivel

The Moon is receding from Earth appr. 3.7cm per year ... so just wait a few
billion years and it'll fly off into space by itself, GuthBall.

On Oct 13, 4:45*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ...
On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in ...
What if now that Earth's oceans are rising we need to move the Moon
further away.? *We have to protect high waves from destroying cities
like NYC London etc. We could do it. *Bert *PS Think New Orleans

Yeah, it would only take what? *The energy of a quadrillion nuclear
bombs to move the moon 1m/s?

Are all republican Yids as dumbfounded as yourself?

Okay, so it won't take that many nukes? *What's your answer?
Talk about obfuscation. *Either prove it wrong or STFU.

Use a million tonnes of the moon itself, as tethered at its own 1.5x
L2, (possibly 2xL2) and just let those natural centripetal forces do
their thing of gradually pulling our Selene/moon further away from
Earth.

It's a little more complicated than that, but it's not insurmountably
complex.

~ BG

On Oct 14, 7:12*am, "Hagar" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in
...

snipperoony GuthBall drivel

The Moon is receding from Earth appr. 3.7cm per year ... so just wait a few
billion years and it'll fly off into space by itself, GuthBall.

No way do we have billions of years. It needs our help, and Earth
needs that little spot of shade, as well as we could all do a whole
lot better with less Newtonian tidal force, and by all means the
sooner the better.

~ BG

I don't see how ... the Earth's rotation is also slowing down, as yet
measured in micro-seconds per year, but the slower it spins, the further
the moon will drift. If that 3.7 cm/year is calculated backwards, it
puts the Moon just outside the Roche Limit, about 18,000 miles
about 4B years ago, giving credence to the theory of the still largely
molten ball of Earth being obliquely impacted by a Mercury/Mars
sized planet traveling in the same direction as Earth, albeit a little
faster, flinging enough surface material into orbit to form the Moon.
The two largely metal cores converged to form the present day core
and exerting the gravity needed to capture the Moon in an steady
orbit. GuthBall really like this theory, along with his Venusian runways
and upper cloud stationed dirigibles.


"Saul Levy" wrote in message
...
No it won't, Hagar! lmfjao!

Eventually the Moon will return to Earth, reach the Roche limit and
BREAK UP!

The MOON is DOOMED!

Saul Levy


On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:12:48 -0700, "Hagar" wrote:


"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in
...

snipperoony GuthBall drivel

The Moon is receding from Earth appr. 3.7cm per year ... so just wait a
few
billion years and it'll fly off into space by itself, GuthBall.

On Oct 15, 6:52*am, "Hagar" wrote:
I don't see how ... the Earth's rotation is also slowing down, as yet
measured in micro-seconds per year, but the slower it spins, the further
the moon will drift. *If that 3.7 cm/year is calculated backwards, it
puts the Moon just outside the Roche Limit, about 18,000 miles
about 4B years ago, giving credence to the theory of the still largely
molten ball of Earth being obliquely impacted by a Mercury/Mars
sized planet traveling in the same direction as Earth, albeit a little
faster, flinging enough surface material into orbit to form the Moon.
The two largely metal cores converged to form the present day core
and exerting the gravity needed to capture the Moon in an steady
orbit. GuthBall really like this theory, along with his Venusian runways
and upper cloud stationed dirigibles.

"Saul Levy" wrote in message

...

No it won't, Hagar! *lmfjao!

Eventually the Moon will return to Earth, reach the Roche limit and
BREAK UP!

The MOON is DOOMED!

Saul Levy

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:12:48 -0700, "Hagar" wrote:

"BradGuth" wrote in message
....
On Oct 13, 10:39 am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in
...

snipperoony GuthBall drivel

The Moon is receding from Earth appr. 3.7cm per year ... so just wait a
few
billion years and it'll fly off into space by itself, GuthBall.

Your mainstream "credence" of that old subjective theory is noted, as
is your kosher approved obfuscation/exclusion of all other evidence
that supports my interpretation, in that as of 12,600 +/- some odd
years ago we obtained our icy Selene/moon (most likely derived from
Sirius B).

Of course our Eden/Earth had been near-miss encountered and/or having
been impacted several times before, as well as affected by the cosmic
likes of nearby red supergiants and their nova/flashover
transformations into white dwarfs.

The icy Selene encounter was most likely a slow motion kind of
lithobraking sucker-punch (glancing rear-ender) that created the
Arctic ocean basin and caused the final seasonal tilt we have today.

~ BG