JSH: They broke the rules

On Oct 3, 10:27*pm, JSH wrote:
I'm making it clear that academics in the mathematical field broke
some serious rules when it comes to research in their own field in
some of its biggest areas, which has proven to me that academics
across the board cannot simply be trusted.

This would certainly depend upon which ivory tower accreditation that
the particular institutionalized status quo finds itself enmeshed with
- the more radical approach depends upon whether or not there is a
conflict with some corporate interest might depend upon how many
bureaucratic tentacles have latched themselves to a particular
technological niche - the more tentacles involved in the corporate
directorships, the more entrenched the bureaucracy, and the more
"concrete" the pantheon, if you will, of interests you will be
offending or catering towards.

My guess is that the whole world shouldn't be THAT much interested in
either (1) dumbing down or (2) obfuscating a revolutionary technology
forever - even if just a few have already found for instance, a
propulsive alternative for either electrical, magnetic, gasoline, or
LOX/H2O2 fuel based alternative. Now it doesn't seem like there's too
much happening beyond the space shuttle (instrument racks are wayyyy
to small) - the shuttle doesn't get us out of earth orbit and beyond.

I mean that there's not anything scheduled for production right now
that would be a ten or twenty million person program that could reap
the benefits of building a massive orbital infrastructure - at least
to keep Americans busy and working for the next 100 years or so.

William Mook used to taolk about these things - emphasizing the
physics and engineering as well as some of the associated
infrastructure - but I'm not convinced that he had the where-with-all.

Just by posting ideas on the internet in places like sci.physics or
sci.space.policy never means that someone immediately receives
noticibility or the acceptance that he or shye should receive - unless
there is a TOTAL honesty in the way that the idea becomes implemented
industry-wide.

The reward system should ALWAYS remain intact ABOVE and BEYOND what
the transnationalist companies are willing to pay their non-American
accomplices, which means that American technical innovation should
ALWAYS remain one step ahead of the transnationalists.

Since most of honest America has become way too much the whipping boy
of the corporate trial lawyers, attorneys, and money-changing bankers,
environmentalists, progressive bureaucrats, and oil-phobe
transnationalists, it's time to reinvent America from the OUTSIDE IN.
(Notice I did not say "INSIDE OUT")

Our frontier for exploration that was once based upon roadway systems
must survive - mat least extraterrestrially - in order to change the
way that "employees" and "travelers" commute to their destinations.

Current methodologies employing roadway systems can still become
utilized for "utility" transport (anyone heard of a massive earth-to-
orbit, nuke-pulsed Orion concept developed nationally in the fifties,
as written about by G. Dyson in his book "Project Orion - The True
Story of the Atomic Spaceship")?

Commuters do not have to depend upon the currently antiquated kinds of
land-based commuter technology if a revolutionary viable alternative
becomes developed - at least extraterrerestrially.

Ergo, everything points to massive earth-to-orbit technology to get us
there. These are suprisingly simple ideas, but it would be involved
with changing the mindset of permanently having a nationally-wide
conglomorate of county-vested roadway infrastructures (i.e. Dept. of
Motor Vehicles, Dept. of Transportation, County Tax Commissioner,
Sheriff's Department, Police Departments, etc.) as well as having a
nationally wide conglomorate of airport-vested and "communication
highway" system (i.e. FAA, FCC, etc.) that becomes transformed by an
industry-wide reinvention of transferrable skill sets in these areas,
to a completely air-based, individual commuter transport system.

James Harris



American