discrepancy of Jupiter, Io orbital precessions with GR predictions#119; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory

Finally making a little bit of progress on the observed versus GR
predicted orbital precessions
of Solar System objects, and the discrepancy
between observed versus predicted.

As far as I could discern this website is 1999 vintage, as the
reference table indicates and is
unpublished. The author/s have a theme of tidal
effects as explaining the missing component of
orbital precession and go so far as to cite binary
stars where GR fails completely in prediction.

My theme is the affects of Solar Emission Pressure on planets and
their magnetospheres.

And I am interested only in Solar System objects
where GR fails, not binary stars. And although this site does not list
the "observed orbital precession," it does indicate what GR predicts.

And Io was cited which I suspect, not sure of, an
actual observed orbital precession of 270 arcseconds/century which
from what I gather is
2700 times larger than what GR predicts for Io.

--- taking notes of this website:

http://www.gsanctuary.com/general_relativity.html

Mercury 43.15 43.09 43.09
Venus 8.66 8.78 17.09
Earth 3.85 3.89 3.54
Mars 1.35 1.37 0.04
Jupiter 0.06 0.06 0.12
--- end taking some notes ---

So all I need is a update of the above with the
actual observed precessions.

I do not know why the authors of the above had
to go to binary stars to emphasize the discrepancy
of GR, when so many of the planets and satellites
easily reveal the disparity between predicted and actual.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies