![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The ET cam was fine but the most impressive images were from the tracking camera from max Q to SRB cut off. I never saw such detailed images from the shuttle in that part of the mission. Several times I saw small white flashes near the main engines. Was it the RCS system? The unsteady motion reminds me on airborne camera footage. But even ALOTS (of Apollo time) got not such a good resolution. The boundary layer turbulence prevented a better seeing. What is new at this camera that it got such excellent results? ## CrossPoint v3.12d R ## |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airborne lasers | Hop David | History | 260 | December 23rd 04 04:33 AM |
Airborne lasers | Hop David | Policy | 210 | December 8th 04 09:51 PM |
Airborne lasers | John Schilling | History | 3 | November 21st 04 01:52 AM |
Airborne lasers (Pulsed?) | Earl Colby Pottinger | History | 2 | November 12th 04 02:36 PM |
More 51-L Airborne Video | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 2 | August 18th 03 08:50 PM |