![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do they even want to put it on the pad?:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gener...I-X%20Stacking "One of the issues involves concerns by some engineers that the shaking of the four-segment space shuttle solid-rocket booster that forms the active portion of the Ares I-X stack will overwhelm the hydraulic mechanism that drives the thrust vector control system that helps guide the vehicle during powered flight. Engineers also want more calculations on whether the vibrations would disable the avionics box linking the flight termination system on the vehicle with the range safety officers who would destroy it if it veers off course. And they want extra analysis on whether any of the secondary structures inside the steel boilerplate simulating the Ares I upper stage - ladders, railings and the like - could shake loose during launch and damage instrumentation or other hardware. Shaking from the Ares I-X first stage isn't the same as that which is driving the design of the final Ares I vehicle. In both cases, thrust oscillation seen as the solid-fuel motor nears burnout sets up the vibration, but on the Ares I the frequency is lower and the harmonics into the crew compartment at the top of the stack is the main concern. On the Ares I-X the expected frequency is about 15 hertz, versus 12 Hz on the five-segment Ares I solid motor, and the concern is with command receiver decoders that ride in an avionics box installed in the forward skirt between the solid motor and the upper stage simulator. If the box is knocked out, the range safety officer would not be able to ignite a pyrotechnic charge designed to break open the motor's casing longitudinally and halt the flight if it strays off course." So, let's get this straight...it may go out of control on launch, then start falling apart, and there will be no way to destroy it. I love this gizmo. It will bring back real excitement to a rocket launch, as the public can cower in foxholes and watch it through those cheap cardboard periscopes like they sold when we were kids. :-D Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
And yet more Ares woes | Pat Flannery | History | 9 | July 1st 09 02:45 PM |
I've added FOUR updates to my Ares-1 article with some NEW calculations that (clearly) show WHY the new Ares-1 can't fly | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | November 12th 07 10:21 AM |
NewSpace rockets __ EELVs __ Ares-I __ REVISED Orion/Ares-I __ FAST-SLV __ chances of success | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | June 16th 07 12:03 AM |
in my opinion (both) Ares-I and Ares-V could NEVER fly once! ...could NASA rockets win vs. privates on launch date and prices? | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | May 10th 07 11:11 PM |
NRO woes, and others | Allen Thomson | Policy | 4 | August 6th 03 03:36 PM |