A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

And yet more Ares woes:



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old July 7th 09, 12:17 AM posted to sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default And yet more Ares woes:

Do they even want to put it on the pad?:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gener...I-X%20Stacking

"One of the issues involves concerns by some engineers that the shaking
of the four-segment space shuttle solid-rocket booster that forms the
active portion of the Ares I-X stack will overwhelm the hydraulic
mechanism that drives the thrust vector control system that helps guide
the vehicle during powered flight.

Engineers also want more calculations on whether the vibrations would
disable the avionics box linking the flight termination system on the
vehicle with the range safety officers who would destroy it if it veers
off course. And they want extra analysis on whether any of the secondary
structures inside the steel boilerplate simulating the Ares I upper
stage - ladders, railings and the like - could shake loose during launch
and damage instrumentation or other hardware.
Shaking from the Ares I-X first stage isn't the same as that which is
driving the design of the final Ares I vehicle. In both cases, thrust
oscillation seen as the solid-fuel motor nears burnout sets up the
vibration, but on the Ares I the frequency is lower and the harmonics
into the crew compartment at the top of the stack is the main concern.
On the Ares I-X the expected frequency is about 15 hertz, versus 12 Hz
on the five-segment Ares I solid motor, and the concern is with command
receiver decoders that ride in an avionics box installed in the forward
skirt between the solid motor and the upper stage simulator.
If the box is knocked out, the range safety officer would not be able to
ignite a pyrotechnic charge designed to break open the motor's casing
longitudinally and halt the flight if it strays off course."

So, let's get this straight...it may go out of control on launch, then
start falling apart, and there will be no way to destroy it.
I love this gizmo.
It will bring back real excitement to a rocket launch, as the public can
cower in foxholes and watch it through those cheap cardboard periscopes
like they sold when we were kids. :-D

Pat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
And yet more Ares woes Pat Flannery History 9 July 1st 09 02:45 PM
I've added FOUR updates to my Ares-1 article with some NEW calculations that (clearly) show WHY the new Ares-1 can't fly gaetanomarano Policy 0 November 12th 07 10:21 AM
NewSpace rockets __ EELVs __ Ares-I __ REVISED Orion/Ares-I __ FAST-SLV __ chances of success gaetanomarano Policy 9 June 16th 07 12:03 AM
in my opinion (both) Ares-I and Ares-V could NEVER fly once! ...could NASA rockets win vs. privates on launch date and prices? gaetanomarano Policy 0 May 10th 07 11:11 PM
NRO woes, and others Allen Thomson Policy 4 August 6th 03 03:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.