Why electron not move in Fixed Orbit?

Igor To fit with my theory that I came up with in 1963 imperial minds
are now referring to the electron as a cloud. I thank them for listening
to me way back then.Stephen Weinberg knew where I was coming from when I
told him electron structure is virtual,and regular photons. That is one
of my better theories that over time gets better received TreBert

On Apr 22, 10:08*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Igor *To fit with my theory that I came up with in 1963 imperial minds
are now referring to the electron as a cloud. I thank them for listening
to me way back then.Stephen Weinberg knew where I was coming from when I
told him electron structure is virtual,and regular photons. *That is one
of my better theories that over time gets better received * TreBert

Electrons are at least half of the photon.

On average there's trillions upon trillions upon trillions of new
photons per second being continually created and radiated from within
most every cubic light year, of course most of which are of photons we
can’t see. Go figure as to the amount of cosmic data that should be
endlessly available per any given cubic light year/sec, or for that
matter per given m3/sec.

One cubic light year = 8.467e47 m3
Volume of our expanding universe = 2e33 x 8.467e47 = 16.934e80 m3
Atoms within our universe of 1.7e81 m3 at 0.1 atom/m3 = 1.7e80 atoms
(or if you like to use 0.1 atom/cm3 = 1.7e86 atoms)

Our relatively passive sun supposedly radiates 1~2e45 (all inclusive)
photons/sec, plus whatever mystery gravitons.

(update/correction) Supposedly we have 2e24 significant photon
emitting stars within this mostly forever expanding universe of ours
(many of them, perhaps more than half, are red dwarfs), and that’s
suggesting roughly more than 1e-9 star per cubic light year, with more
stars being created on the fly, so to speak, not to mention trillions
upon trillions upon trillions of other physical interactions taking
place throughout our universe that can’t but help generate photons of
their own at any given time, plus there are unavoidably secondary/
recoil photons and thereby third, forth and so on generations of those
kinds of pesky photons to contemplate, and yet the mass and energy of
this universe remains essentially unchanged. For the moment, I’ll use
a conservative 1e25 stars offering an average 1e45 photons/sec.

Universe photons/year = ?.?e?? x 31.536e6 = ?.??e?? photons/year

Photons per universe/yr = (1e25 x 1e45) x 31.536e6 = 3.15e77

Per given billion years makes that tally worth 3.15e86 photons

Per 100 billion years = 3.15e87 photons, and so forth.

In other words, it can be safely said there has been and stall always
be far more photons than atoms, especially if you’d care to include
those pesky quantum photons coexisting within all forms of physical
matter. The relatively recent and sudden creation of the absolutely
vibrant and extremely active Sirius star/solar system of 12+ solar
mass evolving right next door if not on top of us, so to speak, would
have been a darn good example of where such deductive observationology
of photons would have been very insightful, especially informative
from those photons we can’t see.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”