![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the
Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 4:40*pm, (n Vaneck) wrote:
One theory about the *"Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. And the size of an atom compared to what, considering that nothing else existed at that point? Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 4:40*pm, (n Vaneck) wrote:
One theory about the *"Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. One cubic light year = 8.467e47 m3 Volume of our expanding universe = 2e33 x 8.467e47 = 16.934e80 m3 Atoms within our universe of 1.7e81 m3 at 0.1 atom/m3 = 1.7e80 atoms 1.7e80 atoms of mostly hydrogen and helium, even when compressed into a black hole of 1e27 g/cm3 is going to be a whole lot bigger than a bread box. So, where exactly did this "size of an atom" notion or revelation come from? ~ BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 4:57*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Apr 12, 4:40*pm, (n Vaneck) wrote: One theory about the *"Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious.. And the size of an atom compared to what, considering that nothing else existed at that point? Double-A According to Einstein, something sure as hell existed, and/or materialized out of less than thin air, so to speak (perhaps from another universe). ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vaneck Size is relative. It was the spacetime of the first event of the
to be universe we see at this space time 22 billion years later, Lots of great space between an electron and a proton. TreBert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 6:40*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Vaneck Size is relative. It was the spacetime of the first event of the to be universe we see at this space time 22 billion years later, *Lots of great space between an electron and a proton. * * * TreBert So, exactly how big was the whatever seed of our universe? As large as our Selene/moon? As large as Eden/Earth? As large as Jupiter? As large as our sun? ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The size of atoms has been measured directly--first by atomic resolution
electron microscopes and more recently by atomic force microscopes. no theory needed and by the way the universe was not condensed to the size of an atom prior to the big bang it started out even smaller.. theory begins I believe at the plank length at zero plus plank time which is the time necessary for light to travel the width of a hydrogen atom...about 1 angstrom... read " the whole shebang" I think it's titled by Alan Guth "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the "Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... The size of atoms has been measured directly--first by atomic resolution electron microscopes and more recently by atomic force microscopes. no theory needed and by the way the universe was not condensed to the size of an atom prior to the big bang it started out even smaller.. theory begins I believe at the plank length at zero plus plank time which is the time necessary for light to travel the width of a hydrogen atom...about 1 angstrom... read " the whole shebang" I think it's titled by Alan Guth My mistake it's written by Timothy Ferris..Guth (not Brad ) wrote The Inflationary Universe also a popularized account of the early universe |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 7:14*pm, "Dave" wrote:
The size of atoms has been measured directly--first by atomic resolution electron microscopes and more recently by atomic force microscopes. *no theory needed and by the way the universe was not condensed to the size of an atom prior to the big bang it started out even smaller.. theory begins I believe at the plank length at zero plus plank time which is the time necessary for light to travel the width of a hydrogen atom...about 1 angstrom... read " the whole shebang" I think it's titled by Alan Guth "n Vaneck" wrote in message ... One theory about the *"Big Bang" I keep hearing lately is that the Universe was condensed to the size of an atom before it exploded. Now I'm no expert but how can anyone theorize about that size? Just curious.. Never trust anyone with the last name of Guth. ~ BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 7:22*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message ... The size of atoms has been measured directly--first by atomic resolution electron microscopes and more recently by atomic force microscopes. *no theory needed and by the way the universe was not condensed to the size of an atom prior to the big bang it started out even smaller.. theory begins I believe at the plank length at zero plus plank time which is the time necessary for light to travel the width of a hydrogen atom...about 1 angstrom... read " the whole shebang" I think it's titled by Alan Guth My mistake it's written by Timothy Ferris..Guth *(not Brad ) wrote The Inflationary Universe also a popularized account of the early universe I have a much better theory. It has to do with other universes tossing out their garbage. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if? (On hydrogen Atom) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 21 | January 30th 08 12:21 AM |
accelerating every atom equally | [email protected] | Policy | 2 | December 14th 07 10:10 AM |
The biggest atom | Spring | Misc | 1 | October 17th 06 09:08 PM |
market size as a function of launcher size | Parallax | Policy | 12 | September 23rd 03 11:14 PM |
Rutherford Atom Revisited | Rob Oldershaw | Research | 0 | July 2nd 03 04:46 PM |