![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What if the density of matter in our universe is the clue to how it will
end? Take galaxies that move so far apart that their mutual gravity can't balance out expansion.If it was strong enough we would have a "closed" universe and one day recolapse in on itself. collapse could create expanding forever at a slower pace forever. My scenario is this "The universe will expand at an ever faster expanding rate" It is thinning out as I type. In a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years from now it will have to be considered empty. Well I posted 3 ways of endng with our todays knowlege,and there coud be more universe endings as humankind gets smarter. TreBert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 6:40*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
What if the density of matter in our universe is the clue to how it will end? Take galaxies that move so far apart that their mutual gravity can't balance out expansion.If it was strong enough *we would have a "closed" universe * * * * * and one day recolapse in on itself. collapse could create expanding forever at a slower pace forever. *My scenario is this "The universe will expand at an ever faster expanding rate" *It is thinning out as I type. * * In a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years from now it will have to be considered empty. * * * Well I posted 3 ways of endng with our todays knowlege,and there coud be more universe endings as humankind gets smarter. *TreBert The Great Attractor by now has already become the cosmic graveyard of thousands of galaxies, with thousands more on their way towards their final demise or grand makeover. In that forbidden realm of our vast universe, nothing has been expanding. ~ BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BG Using my convex & convex theory the universe is going with convex
TreBert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 1:31*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
BG *Using my convex & convex theory the universe is going with convex TreBert Then what the hell is "The Great Attractor" doing? Perhaps it's a quantum wormhole to another universe. ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... BG Using my convex & convex theory the universe is going with convex TreBert Beeert, that doesn't make any sense at all. Convex or concave merely depends on from which direction you observe the gravity well. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 2:05*pm, "Hagar" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... BG *Using my convex & convex theory the universe is going with convex TreBert Beeert, that doesn't make any sense at all. Convex or concave merely depends on from which direction you observe the gravity well. Beeert is no longer running all of his 8 cylinders on beer. It's the cheap wine that has is feeble mind a little extra screwed up. ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hagar Concave space is curved in Convex has space flipping and curving
Think of convex as a negative curve.Like as saddle.(open) Thus our universe is unbounded. This is the reason I posted today the "What if (on the universe's end) TreBert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BG You are bad. you are nasty You are in reality ****ed up. You need
a good shot up your ass. You can not think period/ Get lost **** head TreBert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 3:17*pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
BG *You are bad. you are nasty *You are in reality ****ed up. *You need a good shot up your ass. You can not think period/ Get lost **** head TreBert But you're the one that likes sharing the whole truth and nothing but truth. You're the one claiming that you can't afford beer anymore. Good thing you don't smoke, as that as become seriously spendy. What's suddenly taboo/nondisclosure about "The Great Attractor"? Are you now a republican mafia member in good standing, or just being as bogus as Double-A? ~ BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... What if the density of matter in our universe is the clue to how it will end? Take galaxies that move so far apart that their mutual gravity can't balance out expansion.If it was strong enough we would have a "closed" universe and one day recolapse in on itself. collapse could create expanding forever at a slower pace forever. My scenario is this "The universe will expand at an ever faster expanding rate" It is thinning out as I type. In a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion years from now it will have to be considered empty. Well I posted 3 ways of endng with our todays knowlege,and there coud be more universe endings as humankind gets smarter. TreBert The universe will expand until it has all it can expand, then it will expand no more. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Universes Without End | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | May 5th 06 07:19 PM |
Universes Without End | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 16 | May 5th 06 02:10 AM |
parallel Universes | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 12 | November 11th 05 08:30 PM |
parallel universes | Sirius Black | Science | 3 | February 11th 04 03:39 AM |
More Universes | Bill C. | Misc | 5 | September 9th 03 03:39 PM |