![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Numbers are a dead language to me. So can we have an argument about
tides and lunar algorithms that explains for us dunces how an inexplicable branch of science (such as astrometry with its chaos theory and complex dynamics and hideously difficult algorithms) can come up with such easily grasped concepts straight out of linear systems that explain the way the moon lifts aggregations of miniscule water droplets many feet, without detracting from the overall weight of said particles? And can we post all the flames and trolls to sci.physics not sci.astro or sci.geo.earthquakes, please? -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Guide to the Best Spanish Language Astronomy Education MaterialsDebuts at NOAO Web Site (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 6th 04 01:03 AM |
Red shift and homogeneity | George Dishman | Astronomy Misc | 162 | January 4th 04 09:57 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
RFI: Shuttle Avionics Language Query | OM | Space Shuttle | 4 | September 12th 03 06:58 PM |
Is there extra terretorial life in our UNIVERSE? | mattermysteries | Astronomy Misc | 7 | August 7th 03 11:12 PM |