![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Prior to the CAIB, did *anyone* ever talk about "certifying" Orbiters,
or is that entirely a post-Columbia phenomenon? Because I can't recall it in history, and that includes eleven years in Downey in the eighties. The reason that I ask is that I've acquired part of the appendix on the subject on a recent study that NASA did, and wonder if they just came up with the "certification" language to satisfy the CAIB's question about flying past 2010. I've never before heard of a "certification reverification." What is being described here is basically a reverification. I've posted the text, with a figure for schedule post 2010, at my blog. http://www.transterrestrial.com/?p=16160 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about shuttle / ISS | vag-com | Space Shuttle | 41 | September 21st 06 07:00 PM |
Shuttle-Mir question | Rainer Kresken | Space Shuttle | 8 | August 22nd 05 10:07 PM |
Rutan on FAA certification | Jim Kingdon | Space Science Misc | 0 | November 1st 04 06:09 AM |
Some thoughts on regulation and certification | Rand Simberg | Policy | 5 | September 18th 03 01:38 AM |
Space Flight Demonstrator Completes Design Certification | Ron Baalke | Technology | 0 | August 21st 03 09:25 PM |