![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good morning.
Some time ago I made a rather stuttering attempt at this explanation on YouTube, (math free version) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmAVkj9fTnU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76BB-qZXEho http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT-3R8ju9V0 but I did not feel like doing the mathematics at that time. This morning, I'd like to try to put a FEW equations down. Don't expect here any profound discovery. Typically an explanation has a quality in inverse proportion of the explainer's pride. I'm pretty proud of this explanation, so that's probably not a good sign. ![]() This morning I wanted to describe in my own words and at least give what little bit of the math that I know how to do. I apologize in advance for the math and grammatical errors you'll probably find. In any case, let us consider two parties, A and B, A stays at home, while B moves away into the distance to point C, 1 "light" unit away and then returns home. The speed of light in this model is 1 and the distance is 1 and the velocity which B chooses to travel is v. (where, of course, v=1 represents the speed of light) ---------------- Part 1, What do things look like from the Home Twin, A? So A watches B travel toward point C at velocity v. How long does this take? B arrives at C at time t = distance/velocity = 1/v. However when B arrives at C, there will be a time delay before A sees the event of arrival because of the time the light takes to return from that point. So A observes B's arrival at C at time t = 1+1/v An interesting thing to consider here is that the observed velocity is explicitly calculable from the two observed events (departure observation and arrival observation). A will have observed B's journey at a constant speed. Observed Velocity of Outward trip = distance/time = 1/(1+1/v) = v/(1+v) A similar consideration of the inbound trip yields an Observed Time of the inbound trip of (1/v)-1, and observed velocity v/(1-v) Thus if v=.5, then the observed velocity outbound =.5/1.5 = .3333c, and the obseved velocity inbound = .5/.5 = 1c. If v=.9 then the observed velocity outbound = .9/1.9 = 0.47c and the observed velocity inbound = .9/.1 = 9c. So the maximum observable outbound velocity is .5c but there is NO maximum observable inbound velocity. --------- Part 2. What do things look like from the perspective of the traveling twin, B? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT-3R8ju9V0 From B's perspective there must be some things which are the same, and some things that are different. If all of the same physics apply, then we must assume that the same chemical, nuclear, or matter/anti- matter reactions that produced the velocity v (Between A and B) for observer A must also have produced the same velocity v (Between A and B) for observer B. The real velocities are the same. If the real velocities are the same then should the observed outbound velocity v/(1+v) and observed inbound velocity v/(1-v) be the same? Yes, these calculations are general. The observed inbound and observed outbound velocities are based ONLY on the actual velocity, and nothing else. Though I did the calculation based on a specific pair of events, departure and arrival of observer B, any two events could be used, and they cancel out of the final calculation.) A thing that will be different for the two observers, though is the apparent time that it takes B to travel from A to C and back. Whereas A observed the return trip to happen much faster than outbound trip, B will observe the outbound trip and inbound trip to take the same amount of time. (Other famous gedanken experiments determine that this time would be (1/v)*(1/sqrt(1-v^2)) whereas 1/v would be the expected time it takes to travel distance 1, and the other factor is the time dilation factor) The Observed velocities are the same, but the amount of time traveled at those velocities is different. This means that the observed distance traveled by B is different for B than it is for A. (Technically, B remains stationary relative to observer B, just to be troublesome.) But the greatest point of interest is what happens to the Observed distance to A from the perspective of B during the turn-around. The apparent relative velocity of A on the way out was v/(1+v). The apparent relative velocity of A on the way in will be v/(1-v). If the time is the same, but the apparent velocity is different, then there is only one possibility. The distance CHANGED. You cannot move away from an object at one apparent velocity and then return at a faster apparent velocity for the same period of time unless that object has moved away from you. In effect, the traveling twin at his point of turning-around is transitioning himself into a new reference frame where his home-world is much further away than it was before. Also as his home goes from slow-motion [v/(1+v) .5] to fast forward [v/(1-v) = unlimited.] For the moving twin it may be a surprise that the earth lurches away from him at the point of turnaround, but he will be able to watch the rise and fall of civilizations in fast-forward on his return trip. It won't be a surprise to him when he gets home and everyone he knew is dead unless he has no windows on his space-ship. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2/1 EXPERIMENT AND THE TWIN PARADOX | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 16 | January 8th 09 05:39 PM |
THE SECRET OF THE TWIN PARADOX | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 9th 07 03:48 PM |
The twin paradox revisited | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 6 | July 11th 07 01:47 AM |
The twin paradox revisited | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | July 10th 07 08:19 PM |
Twin non-paradox. Only one explanation. | Der alte Hexenmeister | Astronomy Misc | 40 | January 12th 06 02:00 AM |