An Attractive Proposition

Painius wrote,

2) There is no perceptable upper limit to
the amplitude, i.e., the maximum
absolute value, of EM radiation. If not for a _CARRIER MEDIUM_ of even
greater
energy-density than the most energetic
wave it carries, what ELSE could
account for this critical perceptual
condition?

Indeed. And as a subtext to this Cardinal Observation, precisely WHY is
there no perceptible upper limit? The answer didn't become obvious until
earlier this year, with your inspiration, under the banner of "Bringing
the CBB model full circle".
'Member as to how we were discussin' the size scale of
the hydrogen atom compared to a single 'grain' of the underlying SPED.
In terms of scale, it would be as if the H atom were a bathtub drain
vortex and a molecule of water going down the drain would represent a
'SPED grain' compared to the H atom. That, in a ballpark sense, is the
size scale we're talkin' about. It illustates how the 'SPED grain' is
'waay sub-Planckian in length.
Then, drawing upon the CBB model's universal planform of
*all* rotating systems (dual hemispheres and a common equator rotating
on a polar axis), it became obvious that the 'SPED grain' itself is
likewise a bipolar entity(!), a micro-copy of *all* rotating systems in
nature. S'gotta be. Then, taking a cue from the mainstream's habit of
inventing new "particles" at the drop of a hat, what the hell, why not
take the liberty of naming our little bipolar 'SPED grain' the
'Granulon'?

Bernoulli the younger had envisioned the "aether particle"
as a tiny whirlpool, and the "aether" itself as a universal 'sea' of
these miniscule corpuscular whirlpools as the carrier medium of light.
So bingo, the CBB's 'granulon' IS Bernoulli's corpuscular whirlpool with
the added feature of bipolarity, ie., two mirror-imaging vortices
converging to a point as in the H atom (see the illustration on pg.4 of
the li'l webbie site). The 'granulon sea' also bears a remarkable
resemblance to Dirac's "sea" and to the 'Higgs field'.
But now here's where the fun really begins.

Picture the 'granulon sea' as absolutely quiescent of all
EM radiation (which it never really is due to the CMBR, transiting
starlight etc. But this is a 'thought illustration'). The 'sea' is
absoutely still and unrippled of all EM energy. The 'granulons' lie in
totally random alignment. Now a wave packet, a "photon" stirs the
stillness, nudging granulons into alignment. That wave packet of
*oscillating alignment-state*, a single "photon", then propagates
through the 'sea' at velocity c.

The alignment-state of bipolar 'granulons' oscillating
en masse and propagating at c IS THE PROPAGATION MECHANISM OF MAXWELL'S
'E' AND 'H' FIELDS.

AMPLITUDE of EM radiation is the function of **DEGREE OF
ALIGNMENT** of bipolar granulons oscillating en masse. This explains WHY
there is "no perceptible upper limit to amplitude of EM radiation", the
CBB model's founding observation and maxim.
And it also explains polarization of light.
The high propagation speed is the function of the
extreme energy-density or energy equivalence (a.k.a. PDT value) of the
'sea', expressed as your fanciful "E=mc³" (not represented as a bona
fide "equation" but as an expression denoting sheer emphasis).

So if anyone can offer a *better* explanation than bipolar
'granulons' for there being "no perceptible upper limit to amplitude of
EM radiation", by all means step right up and fill in the
blank_________.

BTW, "flying 'messenger particles' that can be called up in unlimited
numbers on demand and magically 'know' to fly through the 'void' at
exactly c" does not qualify.