Causal mechanism of gravity (Was... )

Painius wrote, responding to one of the VS'ers:

..you and anybody else are welcome and encouraged to answer as many of
the
"What ELSE . . ." questions in the above
six cardinal points of evidence for the
spatial/ gravitational energy medium, the energy that strongly seems
to flow and
accelerate into matter thereby causing
the previously mysterious phenomenon
known as "gravity".

While on the subject, it's worthwhile to mention (again) those other
people worldwide who have deduced *exactly* the same core mechanism of
gravity, among those posting on the web being Shifman. Warren, Lindner,
Paxton, Martin, Huenefeld, Stefanko et al. With only superficial
differences, their models all describe an accelerating, 'reverse
starburst' flow of the spatial medium into mass with mass syonymous with
flow sink. To greater and lesser degrees, they describe the
pressure-state necessary to drive the flow, but do not emphasize and
focus upon the *sheer enormous-ness* of the pressure. AFAIK, only
Wolter's "from-the-top-down" derivation of the model recognizes and
places full emphasis on the SCO's hyperpressure state as the 'key in the
lock' to unifying all the fundamental forces.
Those other aforementioned individuals also recognize, as
Wolter fully did, the 'Roach Motel' issue. But unlike him, they simply
accept it as a given without needing to explain "where the stuff goes"
just as the BB'ers accept the BB as a given without need to explain
where the stuff 'comes from'.
So if the FS model of gravity is just a pipedream, it's
interesting that so many others are seeing the same causal mechanism.
The common denominator they all share is that they don't buy into the
'no medium', space-as-void indoctrination.