An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo

Way to go, Paine! You wrote,

...not heuristic, not an allegory, REAL
space flowing into REAL matter in REAL
time, pushing you down and not letting
you float away. Try holding something
down using geometry or curvature. It will float away. It will float
away because
geometry and curvature do not have the
power to keep your feet on the ground,
let alone the energy necessary to contain the expansion power of our
Sun.

Encore! I would make a couple of tiny additions, thus -

"...REAL space flowing, *accelerating* into REAL matter in REAL time..."

and

"...necessary to contain the expansion power of our Sun *and power the
super/ and hypernovae and quasars*."

"oldcoot" wrote in message...
...

Way to go, Paine!

tips huge Cat-in-the-Hat hat

You wrote,
...not heuristic, not an allegory, REAL
space flowing into REAL matter in REAL
time, pushing you down and not letting
you float away. Try holding something
down using geometry or curvature. It will
float away. It will float away because
geometry and curvature do not have the
power to keep your feet on the ground,
let alone the energy necessary to contain
the expansion power of our Sun.

Encore! I would make a couple of tiny additions, thus -

"...REAL space flowing, *accelerating* into REAL matter in REAL time..."

and

"...necessary to contain the expansion power of our Sun *and power the
super/ and hypernovae and quasars*."

Don't be concerned. Elvis has not yet left the
building. g

These girls and boys are good. Predictable, but
damn good!

happy holidays and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S. "Learning never exhausts the mind."
Leonardo da Vinci

P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net

Painius wrote,

These girls and boys are good.
Predictable, but damn good!

Yeah, it's the same predictable old routine every time. Inveterate,
unwavering VS'ers, they're totally preoccupied with DMP (details,
minutiae and particulars) and see no meaning or relevance to 'big
picture' issues like the SHQ (super/hypernova, quasar) 'Litmus Test' for
theories of gravity.
One of 'em keeps yelping about why a gravitationally
accelerated, charged particle doesn't emit a photon (presumably in
contrast to its emitting a photon if *electromagnetically* accelerated).
But since to him/her there is "no medium", there is no answer and the
question remains a conundrum.
But if there *IS* a medium, and if gravity is the effect of
a smoothly-accelerating spaceflow, and if electromagnetism is the effect
of a *spin component* to a spaceflow (as it is under the CBB model), the
photon is emitted as the result of the particle's interaction with the
field's *spin component*.
But nothin' but nothin' is ever going to change their "no
medium" worldview. Anymore, whenever these hardline VS'ers weigh in and
start harping on their DMP and dismissing the 'Litmus Test', i know
better than to attempt any further discourse with 'em. Not worth the
aggrimavation.
They seem to think somebody's trying to "convince" them of
something, which i sure as hell ain't. I know that's impossible. So i
just slushpile 'em out of hand.
You on the other hand, appear to enjoy endlessly
harrangin' with 'em.