THE POWER OF EINSTEINIANA

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html
Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real — and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated. In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" — and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value. The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

Pentcho Valev

On Dec 18, 11:05 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html

Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real — and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated.

Ahahaha... There is no way out. To achieve what Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar proposed, space must exhibit in negative
mass density. That means a cubic centimeters of space contains so
much negative kilograms of mass. That idea is so f*cking stupid that
it is ever so surprising that so many nitwits have licked it up. Even
Einstein the same nitwit, the same plagiarist, and the same liar
reneged on his own proposal. Does that mean all these nitwits who
licked up on Einstein’s fermented diarrhea are even more stupid than
Einstein that nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar?









In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" — and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value.

It sounds like fairy tale to me. No? Is someone trying to insult the
intelligence of the ones who saw through Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar being nothing more than a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar?

The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

Generation after generation in intoxicating itself with the fermented
diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar would
always say the best prayer. snrug

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

What can I say? The Einstein Dingleberries have long voluntarily and
happily replaced their thinking brains with excrements. They had sold
their soles for these journalism-glorified positions in the academics
that worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. They
love to lick up the fermented diarrhea of Einstein anywhere and
anytime. shrug

On Dec 18, 11:05*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:
http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.


From Osher Doctorow:

Quite a few researchers in a wide variety of fields in physics,
mathematics, quantitative biology, and so on have been questioning
dominant Causation paradigms or their lack of them recently. See my
last 10-20 posts in my Quantum Gravity thread. France, Germany,
Italy, India have especially relatively large numbers of researchers
questioning these things, although of course the dominant paradigms in
the world remain the "default" ones of the "Founding Fathers".

Osher Doctorow

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html
Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real — and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated. In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" — and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value. The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

Pentcho Valev


It is the opposite. Dark matter has no matter, dark energy has no
energy.
Dark matter is a source of energy, dark energy is a source of matter.
Reverse it and get the answers.

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...
On Dec 18, 11:05 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html

Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real — and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated.

Ahahaha... There is no way out. To achieve what Einstein the nitwit,
the plagiarist, and the liar proposed, space must exhibit in negative
mass density. That means a cubic centimeters of space contains so
much negative kilograms of mass. That idea is so f*cking stupid that
it is ever so surprising that so many nitwits have licked it up. Even
Einstein the same nitwit, the same plagiarist, and the same liar
reneged on his own proposal. Does that mean all these nitwits who
licked up on Einstein’s fermented diarrhea are even more stupid than
Einstein that nitwit, that plagiarist, and that liar?
==========================================
The nitwit, plagiarist and liar is too stupid to realise the fermented
diarrhea
aka dork energy has always been known as aether.













In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" — and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value.

It sounds like fairy tale to me. No? Is someone trying to insult the
intelligence of the ones who saw through Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar being nothing more than a nitwit, a
plagiarist, and a liar?

The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

Generation after generation in intoxicating itself with the fermented
diarrhea of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar would
always say the best prayer. snrug

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

What can I say? The Einstein Dingleberries have long voluntarily and
happily replaced their thinking brains with excrements. They had sold
their soles for these journalism-glorified positions in the academics
that worship Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. They
love to lick up the fermented diarrhea of Einstein anywhere and
anytime. shrug

Absolute nonsense. The ultimate fate of the Universe is interesting.
Will we indeed be ripped apart in n billion years. However all thi.s
has little to do with relativity as such. Special Relativity works,
all the experiments have proved it.

http://sites.google.com/site/aitrans...ome/relativity

Is a better website to which I have transferred my data. Relativity is
part of a larger site. All the experiments too have proved that
General Relativity works on the scale up to an including supermassive
black holes. Does GTR work without modifications on the largest (and
smallest) scales.

Well no one has ever claimed it was the ultimate theory. However the
following points remain.

1) Any theory must have GTR as one of its components. GTR must
represent a limiting case.

2) The sort of thing you have been considtently advocating is just
total nonsense.

You may have modified your views. What you seem to be advocating is
something similar to Deutsche Physik.

http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billc.../tachyons.html

Interesting articles on philosopical cosequences of time travel.

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclop...n-condensation

http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?...nciple&spell=1

Tachyons in space time. This selection of papers shows that tachyons
are envisaged as being a part of inflation. Inflation is one thing
which expanded (paradox free BTW) FTL.

I have always been convinced that time travel (bulk matter) +FTL is a
complete impossibility. Particles are an interesting case though. As
the philosopical paper shows the paradox remains none the less. Self
consistency, which is what tachyons require implies a forknown future.
(there is in fact a philosophical distinction between determinism and
forknowledge. The Koran BTW talks very much about determinism (I think
it really means foreknowledge). The time of you death is known. Of
course if you then go and blow yourself up it will be known. This is
determinism though.

The really interesting point is that the tachyon, like other particles
is a quantum mechanical entity with uncertainlty. This gives a future
which is only partially determined.

None of this however is at all relevant to what you have been
consistently saying.


- Ian Parker

On Dec 19, 2:05*am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/36372969.html
Dark Energy: Yes, It's Real — and Overwhelming....."The simplest
explanation," says David Spergel (Princeton University), "is that
there's energy associated with empty space," as Einstein proposed and
particle physicists have long speculated. In other words, Spergel
quips, "even nothing weighs something" — and the weight of nothingness
has a negative value. The universe contains so much nothing, that
nothing's slight negative weight has begun pushing apart everything
that's not already gravitationally bound. Spergel calls the new result
a "triumph of general relativity."

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html

are totally useless and dissident cosmologists seem to have realized
this.

Pentcho Valev


Yet more pieces of the SR/GR house of cards crumble. As I have always
said, the SR/GR pseudoscience is the albatross to the QM science.

On Dec 18, 11:05 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Judging from Google News, within only a few days, at least 234
journalists-sycophants have sung dithyrambs similar to the above one.
In this atmosphere open letters like this one:

http://www.s8int.com/bigbang2.html


How come YOU didn't sign Pacheco? You missed the opportunity to eat
some crow now (in addition to the **** you are eating daily)

On Dec 19, 10:22*am, Dono wrote:
wubba wubba wubba

DoNut the troll has a big hole where his brain is supposed to be.

Unlike Einstein's Relativity,
Quantum Mechanics is just a bundle of statistics from heaps of data
― it's predictive, but semi-random, incomplete.
Relativity is predictive And fully complete, sans randomness.

Perhaps objects vibrate faster at lower altitudes,
thus warping spacetime ― and our simple/3-D minds model it as a force.

When a muon from a cosmic ray ― moving near the speed of light ―
hits you, its momentum is very real, not “ notional �.
In fact, it'd have infinite momentum, if it could move at c.

Likewise, its slower tick-rate is real, not notional.

Muons are natural clocks ― we know how long they live ―
and we know that ― to us humans ― they live longer when
moving near the speed of light.