![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An article at
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1126133357.htm notes that microscopic zircons found in early rocks indicate that the Earth is likely to have had plate tectonics - and surface water - four billion years ago, shortly after its formation, much earlier than previously thought. If we didn't have a dry early Earth, that gained its atmosphere and oceans later through gradual volcanic outgassing... where _did_ the water come from? I'm wondering if these discoveries will eventually lead to a new theory... that the Earth began life as a gas giant, but which was too small and too hot to retain its atmosphere the way Uranus and Neptune did? John Savard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Quadibloc" wrote in message ... An article at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1126133357.htm notes that microscopic zircons found in early rocks indicate that the Earth is likely to have had plate tectonics - and surface water - four billion years ago, shortly after its formation, much earlier than previously thought. If we didn't have a dry early Earth, that gained its atmosphere and oceans later through gradual volcanic outgassing... where _did_ the water come from? I'm wondering if these discoveries will eventually lead to a new theory... that the Earth began life as a gas giant, but which was too small and too hot to retain its atmosphere the way Uranus and Neptune did? John Savard Are you saying that the earths water condensed out of a gaseous atmosphere? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you saying that the earths water condensed out of a gaseous
atmosphere? I thought the most popular current explanation is that the Earth's water came from comet bombardments. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Curtis Croulet" wrote in message ... Are you saying that the earths water condensed out of a gaseous atmosphere? I thought the most popular current explanation is that the Earth's water came from comet bombardments. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33°27'59"N, 117°05'53"W Me too and makes a lot of sense over the first eons of formation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
plateaus and plate tectonics | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 1st 08 06:37 PM |
Starting subduction in Plate Tectonics - How? | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 19th 06 12:59 AM |
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 8 | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 61 | July 5th 06 10:15 AM |
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 6 | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 35 | July 3rd 06 12:33 AM |
Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7 | don findlay | Astronomy Misc | 48 | July 1st 06 05:28 PM |