![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was wondering how synthetic photometry works.
In the optical region, filter transmission curves are usually quite nice and smooth and they do not include the effect of atmospheric transmission (thinking of UBVRI Bessell 1990 transmission curves) . For near-infrared filters, things get more complicated with the inclusion of air transmission accounting e.g. for water vapor and the response functions are shaped quite considerably by the atmosphere. However, also in the optical regime the atmosphere has important contribution (with telluric lines, oxygen molecules etc...). I always though that such effects are corrected in the published photometry on night-by-night basis, so that's why filter transmission curves only are enough to generate synthetic optical magnitudes. But in the infrared case, the atmospheric contribution must is included in the filter transmissions published in literature. Why such a different approach? Is published infrared photometry actually not corrected on night-by-night basis to eliminate the atmospheric contribution? Thanks in advance, Wolfi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CCD Photometry - Need Equipment Suggestions | Vic Sandoval | CCD Imaging | 2 | June 27th 06 07:21 PM |
Converting old photometry units | PrisNo6 | Research | 0 | April 8th 04 10:00 AM |
ETX90 and variable photometry | Bahjah | Misc | 1 | March 25th 04 09:20 AM |
High Speed Photometry | Ed Majden | Research | 0 | August 26th 03 11:10 PM |
High Speed Photometry | Ed Majden | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 24th 03 07:14 PM |