![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, recall the 1908 Tunguska event. The most
likely scenario is a meteor or piece of a comet about, say, 60 meters in diameter, entering the Earth's atmosphere at high speed, then exploding with the force of maybe 10 to 20 megatons before reaching the ground. Now, I realize the tremendous heat build-up that must have occured with this natural object as it streaked through the air, but just *what* are the dynamics behind this, i.e. just HOW does a rock (or chunk of ice) explode with such temendous force? I did a quick search on this before posting, but I'm too lazy to keep at it. Does someone here know just what would cause such an object to blow with such force? To say that it just heats up and explodes is not good enough. (BTW, imagine this happening just 50 years later, at the height of the Cold War...) -- Oracle |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Llanzlan Klazmon The 15th" replied to "OracleofBugtussle":
Okay, recall the 1908 Tunguska event. The most likely scenario is a meteor or piece of a comet about, say, 60 meters in diameter, entering the Earth's atmosphere at high speed, then exploding with the force of maybe 10 to 20 megatons before reaching the ground. Now, I realize the tremendous heat build-up that must have occured with this natural object as it streaked through the air, but just *what* are the dynamics behind this, i.e. just HOW does a rock (or chunk of ice) explode with such temendous force? Sir Isaac Newton worked this out for you. Kinetic energy = 1/2 MV^2. Do the math. That is not an answer to his question. Why does a rock explode rather than disintegrate gradually, or dig a hole deep into the Earth, or get really hot, or bounce, or something else? It's like asking why a stick of dynamite explodes when hit by the shock of a blasting cap, while a stick of wood containing the same amount of chemical potential energy just gets nudged. He obviously wants something more than just "a large amount of energy goes into an object in a very short period of time", but less than a detailed analysis of what happens to each molecule. I do, too. -- Jeff, in Minneapolis .. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Llanzlan Klazmon The 15th wrote in message . 37.6...
Sir Isaac Newton worked this out for you. Kinetic energy = 1/2 MV^2. Do the math. I was hoping for a lot more than this. Giving the simple kinetic energy equation does nothing to explain how a rock or ice chunk explodes in mid-air with 15 MT force. -- Oracle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OracleofBugtussle" wrote...
in message om... Llanzlan Klazmon The 15th wrote... in message . 37.6... Sir Isaac Newton worked this out for you. Kinetic energy = 1/2 MV^2. Do the math. I was hoping for a lot more than this. Giving the simple kinetic energy equation does nothing to explain how a rock or ice chunk explodes in mid-air with 15 MT force. -- Oracle Well, let's think about it, Oracle... What if the shockwave caused by entry into the atmosphere was all that hit the ground? And by the time the physical mass of the object got near the surface, it had disintegrated to just about nothing. No explosion, just the tremendous shockwave, that apparently had a null area near its center, hits the ground with enough force to level a forest. Another possibility... If there was still sufficient mass to leave a crater, then could the shockwave have bounced/reflected back after hitting the surface? Perhaps this was enough energy to blow the mass of the object to smithereens? and to leave no crater? Or... Shot apart by alien artillery? g happy days and... starry starry nights! -- "Oh give me please the Universe keys That unlock all those mysteries!" You pay your fees, you find some keys, That keeps you always groping. "Oh give me please the Happiness keys That ease the pain of biting fleas!" Today you seize you need no keys, That door is always open. Paine Ellsworth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Painius" wrote in message ...
Well, let's think about it, Oracle... What if the shockwave caused by entry into the atmosphere was all that hit the ground? And by the time the physical mass of the object got near the surface, it had disintegrated to just about nothing. No explosion, just the tremendous shockwave, that apparently had a null area near its center, hits the ground with enough force to level a forest. Another possibility... If there was still sufficient mass to leave a crater, then could the shockwave have bounced/reflected back after hitting the surface? Perhaps this was enough energy to blow the mass of the object to smithereens? and to leave no crater? Or... Shot apart by alien artillery? g You apparently have little or no knowledge of this event. This is just more idle BS. I'm surprised at the quality (or lack thereof) of responses here. I was discussing this subject with a friend, and neither one of us can come up with ideas on how this mid-air explosion (of high thermonuclear weapon yield) could have come about. But FYI, there was a book written in about '78 that, I think, covered and promoted the idea that the explosion was caused by the nuclear engines on an extraterrestrial spacecraft that was in trouble high in the Earth's atmosphere that morning. I didn't read the whole book, and it's been a long time, but I believe they speculated that the craft was deliberately steered to that sparse area so as not to have much of an effect on life here, etc. The name of the book is _The Fire Came By_. -- Oracle |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OracleofBugtussle" wrote...
in message om... "Painius" wrote in message... ... Well, let's think about it, Oracle... What if the shockwave caused by entry into the atmosphere was all that hit the ground? And by the time the physical mass of the object got near the surface, it had disintegrated to just about nothing. No explosion, just the tremendous shockwave, that apparently had a null area near its center, hits the ground with enough force to level a forest. Another possibility... If there was still sufficient mass to leave a crater, then could the shockwave have bounced/reflected back after hitting the surface? Perhaps this was enough energy to blow the mass of the object to smithereens? and to leave no crater? Or... Shot apart by alien artillery? g You apparently have little or no knowledge of this event. This is just more idle BS. I'm surprised at the quality (or lack thereof) of responses here. What i lack in knowledge of this event, you certainly make up for with your lack of diplomacy and tact! You remind me of me! g I was discussing this subject with a friend, and neither one of us can come up with ideas on how this mid-air explosion (of high thermonuclear weapon yield) could have come about. But FYI, there was a book written in about '78 that, I think, covered and promoted the idea that the explosion was caused by the nuclear engines on an extraterrestrial spacecraft that was in trouble high in the Earth's atmosphere that morning. I didn't read the whole book, and it's been a long time, but I believe they speculated that the craft was deliberately steered to that sparse area so as not to have much of an effect on life here, etc. The name of the book is _The Fire Came By_. -- Oracle I like my speculations SO much better. Why don't you thrall me with your acumen, Oracle? Tell me what you think is wrong with my reflections? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Sometimes OH! my mind grips a thought so unkind That it twists me to heights of contortion... I'm often so glad that my mom and my dad Didn't follow along with abortion! Paine Ellsworth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 04:53:26 GMT, Doug Cunningly
wrote: (OracleofBugtussle) wrote in . com: Okay, recall the 1908 Tunguska event. The most likely scenario is a meteor or piece of a comet about, say, 60 meters in diameter, entering the Earth's atmosphere at high speed, then exploding with the force of maybe 10 to 20 megatons before reaching the ground. Now, I realize the tremendous heat build-up that must have occured with this natural object as it streaked through the air, but just *what* are the dynamics behind this, i.e. just HOW does a rock (or chunk of ice) explode with such temendous force? I was under the impression that the rock itself doesn't get that hot, but the air in front of it builds up a HUGE shock wave. When that hits the earth, it has nowhere to go so it blows the falling object up with the crater. Meteors themselves are very cold inside from what I've heard. LK the XVth summed it up. yep, you do get a huge shockwave, but a comet/asteroid travelling at a multiple number of miles per second hits the atmosphere like it were a solid incompressible wall. it dumps just about all its velocity into kinetic energy - shockwave, light, heat, sound, etc. if you have a realistic idea of its mass, its speed and know the conversion factor between joules and kT or Mt, voila, there's your answer. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Cunningly wrote in message link.net...
I was under the impression that the rock itself doesn't get that hot, but the air in front of it builds up a HUGE shock wave. I'm sure there is a huge shock wave in front, but the rock DOES get very hot...white hot. When that hits the earth, it has nowhere to go so it blows the falling object up with the crater. Well, there was no crater at Tunguska, as the explosion took place thousands of feet above ground. In fact, the area under the explosion had trees standing, while the area all around had the forest flattened, which is typical with a high-energy airburst. -- Oracle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
$5M Moon Rock Stolen From Malta Museum | Rusty B | Policy | 96 | June 12th 04 08:46 PM |
Mars Exploration Rovers Update - February 27, 2004 | publius | Policy | 0 | February 28th 04 03:58 PM |
Gamma-Ray Bursts, X-Ray Flashes, and Supernovae Not As Different As They Appear | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 13th 03 05:29 PM |
Gamma-Ray Bursts, X-Ray Flashes, and Supernovae Not As DifferentAs They Appear/Despite Appearances, Cosmic Explosions Have Common Origin,Astronomers Discover (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 13th 03 05:28 PM |
AN EDITORIAL -- Princeton -- Explaining What Pseudos See | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 21st 03 04:43 AM |