A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

latest news CONFIRMS my SUSPECTS about the """Google""" Lunar XPrize



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 30th 08, 05:17 PM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default latest news CONFIRMS my SUSPECTS about the """Google""" Lunar XPrize

..

just five weeks after ( http://spacefellowship.com/Forum/about7639.html
) my doubts (and my post here) this news (
http://www.livescience.com/blogs/200...ams-with-nasa/
) confirms ALL my suspects about the """Google""" Lunar X Prize
( http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/008moonprize.html ) correctness...

so (clearly) ALL other GLXP teams are (definitely) only the Odyssey
Moon's "sparring partners"

just remember that Google has several agreements with NASA and (also)
has rented (for long time) a NASA building and the space to build
another in two NASA space centers!

this kind of join venture means that Google (or a small and, maybe,
also non-american, GLXP team) CAN'T "compete" with NASA in the lunar
exploration, landing a rover on the Moon BEFORE the US space agency
and WITHOUT its logo!!! ...as I've already predicted (in my ghostNASA
articles and with several space forums' posts) over one year ago...

..
  #2  
Old October 30th 08, 11:55 PM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default latest news CONFIRMS my SUSPECTS about the """Google""" LunarX Prize

..

the REAL value of the GIANT advantage Odyssey Moon will have, ISN'T
the use of NASA hardware, materials, instruments, test machines, etc.
but the FREE NASA's KNOW-HOW (that is PRICELESS)

if (e.g.) they'll use $2M of NASA "things" and pay a $2M
"remboursement", it will never be the right price for the REAL value
of the know-how they'll receive developing its lunar rover in the SAME
labs, with the SAME tools and side-by-side with the SAME engineers
that have developed the Sojurner, Spirit, Opportunity, Cassini,
Phoenix, etc. !!!

the US government have paid hundreds billion$$$ over the last 50 years
to "build" the NASA's know-how about spacecrafts, spaceflights, space
probes, Mars rovers, landers, procedures, materials, software, etc.

and now, NASA will give away its valuable know-how to Odyssey Moon
(and ONLY to Odyssey Moon) FOR FREE

it's a $500+ million GIFT that Odyssey Moon NEVER can "pay!!!

surely, Odyssey Moon can't "pay" the NASA's know-how just
"reimbursing" the nuts and bolts (or the electricity...) they'll use
developing its rover in the NASA space centers!!!

it's really incredible that no one of the other GLXP sparring-partners/
teams did not PROTEST for the GALACTIC advantage that NASA and Google
are giving to Odyssey "The Chosen" Moon, or (at least) ask them to
have the SAME advantages, develop their rovers in the SAME space
centers and use the SAME know-how the NASA engineers may/will give to
Odyssey "The Chosen" Moon!!!

last, I've read in a comment to this news, that, also the GLXP rules
prohibits to all these "independent" teams to receive any kind of help
(money and/or know-how) from government agencies!

..
  #3  
Old October 31st 08, 01:32 AM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default latest news CONFIRMS my SUSPECTS about the """Google""" LunarX Prize

..

more about the NASA/Google/Odyssey Moon agreement/help he

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archi...0/1618826.aspx

..
  #4  
Old October 31st 08, 09:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 558
Default Warning Clueless GM thread

On Oct 30, 7:55*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

the REAL value of the GIANT advantage Odyssey Moon will have, ISN'T
the use of NASA hardware, materials, instruments, test machines, etc.
but the FREE NASA's KNOW-HOW (that is PRICELESS)

if (e.g.) they'll use $2M of NASA "things" and pay a $2M
"remboursement", it will never be the right price for the REAL value
of the know-how they'll receive developing its lunar rover in the SAME
labs, with the SAME tools and side-by-side with the SAME engineers
that have developed the Sojurner, Spirit, Opportunity, Cassini,
Phoenix, etc. !!!


Wrong again

The agreement is with NASA Ames and they have very limited "lunar" nor
spacecraft know-how. So little, that LCROSS and Kepler were taken
away from them to be managed elsewhere

Sojurner, Spirit, Opportunity, Cassini, Phoenix were developed by JPL
and Lockheed Martin.

So the "the SAME tools and side-by-side with the SAME engineers" are
not available to Ames.

  #5  
Old November 1st 08, 01:32 AM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default Warning Clueless GM thread

..

just read this:

"The MoonOne lander will be adapted from a nifty bit of hardware being
cultivated at NASA Ames - the Common Spacecraft Bus. I’ve seen this
equipment myself - and a dedicated team at Ames has been working
diligently on this multi-purpose gear, all made possible by Ames
leader, Pete Worden."

from this article:

http://www.livescience.com/blogs/200...ams-with-nasa/

Odyssey Moon will a "ready to eat" dish from the NASA Ames center
saving decades of research and hundreds millions of dollars!

..
  #6  
Old November 1st 08, 09:09 PM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default Warning Clueless GM thread

..

latest news say that also the Senior LEGO Director Lewis Pinault has
joined Odyssey Moon:

http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/lun...ard-of-advisor

from the article, we know that "He serves on the European Space
Agency's Visionary Industry Group Committee."

with the support of NASA, Google and (now) an ESA official, the
(former) "Google Lunar X Prize" ultimately become the "Odyssey Moon
[own] Prize"

..
  #7  
Old November 2nd 08, 12:08 AM posted to sci.space.policy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default latest news CONFIRMS my SUSPECTS about the """Google""" LunarX Prize

On Oct 30, 9:17 am, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

just five weeks after (http://spacefellowship.com/Forum/about7639.html
) my doubts (and my post here) this news (http://www.livescience.com/blogs/200...n-lander-group...
) confirms ALL my suspects about the """Google""" Lunar X Prize
(http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/008moonprize.html) correctness...

so (clearly) ALL other GLXP teams are (definitely) only the Odyssey
Moon's "sparring partners"

just remember that Google has several agreements with NASA and (also)
has rented (for long time) a NASA building and the space to build
another in two NASA space centers!

this kind of join venture means that Google (or a small and, maybe,
also non-american, GLXP team) CAN'T "compete" with NASA in the lunar
exploration, landing a rover on the Moon BEFORE the US space agency
and WITHOUT its logo!!! ...as I've already predicted (in my ghostNASA
articles and with several space forums' posts) over one year ago...

.


Google/NOVA, DARPA and NASA are one in the same.

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
might Odissey-Moon be the Google's expected, preferred, designed,"chosen" and (maybe) "funded" GLXP team to WIN the prize? with ALL otherteams that just play the "sparring partners" role? gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 27th 08 06:47 PM
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 15th 08 04:47 PM
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 gaetanomarano Policy 9 August 30th 08 12:05 AM
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] Amateur Astronomy 1 April 29th 08 01:29 PM
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" fishfry Astronomy Misc 0 February 13th 08 02:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.