![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In 1963, the editors of American Behavioral Scientist magazine were convinced of the merits of Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky's science -- contained in "Worlds in Collision" and "Earth in Upheaval," published in the early 1950s -- and were aware of the mushroom cloud of denial that had been generated from within the scientific community. The editors considered these events to be of major importance to the history of science. Therefore, they displayed tremendous courage by devoting their September 1963 issue to defending Velikovsky. It contained three papers dealing with the Velikovsky controversy -- by Ralph Juergens, Livio Stecchini and publisher Alfred de Grazia, as well as a paper submitted by Velikovsky himself. Three years later -- in 1966 -- this edition of American Behavioral Scientist wound up as a hard-cover book entitled "The Velikovsky Affair: The Warfare of Science and Scientism," edited by de Grazia and published by University Books Inc., New Hyde Park, N.Y. ~~~~ "THE VELIKOVSKY AFFAIR" Foreward (by Alfred de Grazia) In 1950, a book called Worlds in Collision, by Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky, gave rise to a controversy in scientific and intellectual circles about scientific theories and the sociology of science. Dr. Velikovsky's historical and cosmological concepts, bolstered by his acknowledged scholarship, constituted a formidable assault on certain established theories of astronomy, geology and historical biology, and on the heroes of those sciences. Newton, himself, and Darwin were being challenged, and indeed the general orthodoxy of an ordered universe. The substance of Velikovsky's ideas is briefly presented in the first chapter of this book. What must be called the scientific establishment rose in arms, not only against th new Velikovsky theories but against the man himself. Efforts were made to block dissemination of Dr. Velikovsky's ideas, and even to punish supporters of his investigations. Universities, scientific societies, publishing houses, the popular press were approached and threatened; social pressures and professional sanctions were invoked to control public opinion. There is no doubt that in a totalitarian society, not only would Dr. Velikovsky's reputation have been at stake, but also his right to pursue his inquiry, and perhaps his own personal safety. As it was, the "establishment" succeeded in building a wall of unfavorable sentiment around him: to thousands of scholars the name of Velikovsky bears the taint of fantasy, science-fiction and publicity. He could not be suppressed entirely. In the next few years he published three more books. He carried on a large correspondence. And he was helped by friends and by a large general public composed of persons outside of the establishments of science. The probings of spacecraft tended to confirm -- never to disprove -- his arguments. Eventually, the venomous aspects of the controversy, the efforts at suppression, the campaign of vilification loomed almost as large, in their consequences to science, as the original issue. Social scientists, who had been generally aware of Dr. Velikovsky's work, now found themselves in the thick of the conflict. The involvement of the social and behavioral sciences in the scientific theories of Velikovsky was higher than had been earlier appreciated. The social sciences are the basis of Velikvsky's work: despite his proficiency in the natural sciences, it is by the use of the methodology of social science that Velikovsky launched his challenge to accepted cosmological theories. No one pretends that this method is adequate. New forms of interdisciplinary research are needed to wed, for example, the study of myth with the study of meteorities. Nor does one have to agree that Velikovsky is the greatest technician of mythology, even while granting his great conceptual and synthesizing powers. Whatever the scientific substance, the controversy inself could not be avoided or dismissed by behavioral science. The problem of sicence is one of the agitating problems of the twentieth century. The issues are clear: Who determines scientific truth: Who are its high priests, and what is their warrant? How do they establish their canons? What effects do they have on the freedom of inquiry, and on public interest? In the end, some judgment must be passed upon the behavior of the scientific world and, if adverse, some remedies must be proposed . . . It is our hope that the publication of these papers in the present volume (a revised and enlarged version) will make it less easy for Velikovsky's new work to be suppressed, or lightly dismissed. We hope, too, that they will help scientists and interested laymen everywhere to rehearse the problems and to reform the errors of the vast enterprise of science. Ed Conrad http://www.edconrad.com Man as Old as Coal ================================================= WHY PSEUDOS' BRAINS ARE IN UPHEAVAL Specimens -- Some Human -- Found Between Coal Veins) http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-012F.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG and, the latest discovery, a petrified human toe (with toenail). http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG shown with the petrified human finger (with fingernail). http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Conrad wrote in message . ..
snip drivel Ed, please shut up and go away. Thanks. =============================================== Lenny Flank "There are no loose threads in the web of life" Creation "Science" Debunked: http://www.geocities.com/lflank DebunkCreation Email list: http://www.groups.yahoo/group/DebunkCreation |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lenny Flank wrote:
Ed Conrad wrote: snip drivel Ed, please shut up and go away. Last night upon the stair I met a brain that wasn't there It wasn't there again today I wish that Ed would go away... -- John Wilkins wilkins.id.au For long you live and high you fly, and smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry and all you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Conrad wrote in message . ..
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC), (Lenny Flank) wrote: Ed Conrad wrote in message . .. snip drivel Ed, please shut up and go away. You SURE wish, Lenny. But your -- and the other pseudos' -- days, fortunately, are numbered. Ed Conrad Everybody who pays attention to what Ed says, raise your hand. Yeah, that's what I thought. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sporkmastar Fred" wrote in message om... Ed Conrad wrote in message . .. On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC), (Lenny Flank) wrote: Ed Conrad wrote in message . .. snip drivel Ed, please shut up and go away. You SURE wish, Lenny. But your -- and the other pseudos' -- days, fortunately, are numbered. Ed Conrad Everybody who pays attention to what Ed says, raise your hand. Ed who? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CORRECTION -- National PSEUDOscience Foundation. | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 18th 03 10:36 PM |