![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We were having a little beach party on a Saturday night (9/20/2003) on
the shores of Lake Superior just outside Marquette MI. The sky was clear and the Milky Way was very beautiful. Mars was quite bright, and my wife and i even saw a satellite pass over. Then my father pointed out a bright light in the northern sky. It was brighter than Mars. It even appeared to have a halo. I don't know when it started, but we watched it for maybe a minute or more. Then it faded to the brightness of a dim star. It did not move relative to the other stars. After it faded, i checked my watch. It was 9:20 p.m., Eastern time. I'm not as familiar with the constellations as i would like to be, but my wife was sure that it was in Perseus. Does anyone have an idea about what we saw that night? From what i have read, it sounds like variable stars don't shine that bright, and novas last for days. Thanks for your help, --david kristola |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Kristola" wrote in message om... We were having a little beach party on a Saturday night (9/20/2003) on the shores of Lake Superior just outside Marquette MI. The sky was clear and the Milky Way was very beautiful. Mars was quite bright, and my wife and i even saw a satellite pass over. Then my father pointed out a bright light in the northern sky. It was brighter than Mars. It even appeared to have a halo. I don't know when it started, but we watched it for maybe a minute or more. Then it faded to the brightness of a dim star. It did not move relative to the other stars. After it faded, i checked my watch. It was 9:20 p.m., Eastern time. I'm not as familiar with the constellations as i would like to be, but my wife was sure that it was in Perseus. Does anyone have an idea about what we saw that night? From what i have read, it sounds like variable stars don't shine that bright, and novas last for days. Thanks for your help, --david kristola Other than the bit about not moving, and lasting a minute, what you saw sounds a lot like an "Iridium Flare" caused by specular reflection from the solar panels on a satellite. So possibly it was a high altitude spy satellite in a polar orbit. Iridium satellites are in relatively low polar/high inclination orbits and move visibly; the flares can be bright enough to be seen in daylight and last maybe 10 seconds. The halo might be due to a small amount of cirrus cloud or haze that you couldn't see. Iridium Flares can be checked and predicted on the website http://www.heavens-above.com/ Unfortunately, they only keep details on flares for about 48 hours before present, so you can't check something two months old. You can get local predictions a week ahead. Alternative identification might be a high altitude military aircraft with its landing lights on. When I worked at Palomar the B52s and C5As coming in to land at a local base would sometimes fly over and spoil my efforts at photometry. They were supposed to avoid the area. They were often so quiet that you would see the light but not hear the engines. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Dworetsky wrote:
"David Kristola" wrote in message om... We were having a little beach party on a Saturday night (9/20/2003) on the shores of Lake Superior just outside Marquette MI. The sky was clear and the Milky Way was very beautiful. Mars was quite bright, and my wife and i even saw a satellite pass over. Then my father pointed out a bright light in the northern sky. It was brighter than Mars. It even appeared to have a halo. I don't know when it started, but we watched it for maybe a minute or more. Then it faded to the brightness of a dim star. It did not move relative to the other stars. After it faded, i checked my watch. It was 9:20 p.m., Eastern time. I'm not as familiar with the constellations as i would like to be, but my wife was sure that it was in Perseus. ....snip... Alternative identification might be a high altitude military aircraft with its landing lights on. When I worked at Palomar the B52s and C5As coming in to land at a local base would sometimes fly over and spoil my efforts at photometry. They were supposed to avoid the area. They were often so quiet that you would see the light but not hear the engines. Rob Kennicutt (head editor of the Astrophysical Journal these days) has an amazing plate taken with the Palomar Schmidt showing the result of the autoguider attempting to lock onto a B-52's landing lights during an exposure of (IIRC) NGC 2403. Very entertaining as long as they weren't my data... And back on-topic, you can run the heavens-above flare predictions backwards - the fastest way is to ask for the next 7 days, then repeatedly use the "previous" link. However, I cannot vouch for whether it pulls out the proper historical orbital elements. I ran it backward for Marquette, and (voila!) there was a flare of magnitude -2 at 2120 EDT! It was fairly low in the sky (30 degrees or so, due north), which makes the satellites move slowly enough that without a good reference star, they can look pretty stationary. And (for non-Iridium spotters) the flare could appear as bright as mag -7 depending on exactly where the observer was within about a 35-km band. Bill Keel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "William C. Keel" wrote in message ... Mike Dworetsky wrote: "David Kristola" wrote in message om... We were having a little beach party on a Saturday night (9/20/2003) on the shores of Lake Superior just outside Marquette MI. The sky was clear and the Milky Way was very beautiful. Mars was quite bright, and my wife and i even saw a satellite pass over. Then my father pointed out a bright light in the northern sky. It was brighter than Mars. It even appeared to have a halo. I don't know when it started, but we watched it for maybe a minute or more. Then it faded to the brightness of a dim star. It did not move relative to the other stars. After it faded, i checked my watch. It was 9:20 p.m., Eastern time. I'm not as familiar with the constellations as i would like to be, but my wife was sure that it was in Perseus. ...snip... Alternative identification might be a high altitude military aircraft with its landing lights on. When I worked at Palomar the B52s and C5As coming in to land at a local base would sometimes fly over and spoil my efforts at photometry. They were supposed to avoid the area. They were often so quiet that you would see the light but not hear the engines. Rob Kennicutt (head editor of the Astrophysical Journal these days) has an amazing plate taken with the Palomar Schmidt showing the result of the autoguider attempting to lock onto a B-52's landing lights during an exposure of (IIRC) NGC 2403. Very entertaining as long as they weren't my data... And back on-topic, you can run the heavens-above flare predictions backwards - the fastest way is to ask for the next 7 days, then repeatedly use the "previous" link. However, I cannot vouch for whether it pulls out the proper historical orbital elements. I ran it backward for Marquette, and (voila!) there was a flare of magnitude -2 at 2120 EDT! It was fairly low in the sky (30 degrees or so, due north), which makes the satellites move slowly enough that without a good reference star, they can look pretty stationary. And (for non-Iridium spotters) the flare could appear as bright as mag -7 depending on exactly where the observer was within about a 35-km band. Bill Keel Thanks for the tip on backdating Iridium predictions! And for the interesting anecdote on aircraft over Palomar. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"William C. Keel" wrote in message ...
Mike Dworetsky wrote: "David Kristola" wrote in message om... We were having a little beach party on a Saturday night (9/20/2003) on the shores of Lake Superior just outside Marquette MI. The sky was (snip) ...snip... Alternative identification might be a high altitude military aircraft with its landing lights on. When I worked at Palomar the B52s and C5As coming in to land at a local base would sometimes fly over and spoil my efforts at photometry. They were supposed to avoid the area. They were often so quiet that you would see the light but not hear the engines. Rob Kennicutt (head editor of the Astrophysical Journal these days) has an amazing plate taken with the Palomar Schmidt showing the result of the autoguider attempting to lock onto a B-52's landing lights during an exposure of (IIRC) NGC 2403. Very entertaining as long as they weren't my data... And back on-topic, you can run the heavens-above flare predictions backwards - the fastest way is to ask for the next 7 days, then repeatedly use the "previous" link. However, I cannot vouch for whether it pulls out the proper historical orbital elements. I ran it backward for Marquette, and (voila!) there was a flare of magnitude -2 at 2120 EDT! It was fairly low in the sky (30 degrees or so, due north), which makes the satellites move slowly enough that without a good reference star, they can look pretty stationary. And (for non-Iridium spotters) the flare could appear as bright as mag -7 depending on exactly where the observer was within about a 35-km band. Bill Keel Thanks very much! While a satellite flare isn't as cosmic as a nova, it is very interesting. Due north, 30 degrees, 2120 EDT. That is the right place and time. I guess my perception of time was a little off (10 seconds can seem like a minute here in Silicon valley when the ground is shaking). The new Marquette airport used to be a SAC base. When i first looked up and saw the light, "B-52" came to mind. But there was no apparent motion as there would be with a plane (and if it was at a very high altitide, it would not have been so bright). I guess that the angular motion was small enough that i wasn't able to notice it. After the flare faded, i checked the time then looked back at the sky. I wasn't sure which "star" it had been, but there were a number of dim stars in the area (about the brightness of a satellite). I didn't watch for long. Perhaps i would have seen it move if i had. The interesting thing is that i work with some people who worked on Iridium, and my cube is in the same building where the solar panal was probably made. Thanks again! --david kristola |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NOVA strings and branes | Asimov | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 03 02:14 PM |
Brian Greene's NOVA Elegant Universe | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 30th 03 03:26 AM |
Brian Greene's NOVA "Elegant Universe" | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 30th 03 03:19 AM |
PBS NOVA: "The Elegant Universe" (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 27th 03 07:40 PM |
Availability of NOVA show "Lost Moon" | Dave Bartolini | History | 2 | August 8th 03 03:47 PM |