A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Antirelativity - The true motive



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 08, 01:53 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Antirelativity - The true motive

On Sep 2, 1:37*am, "hanson" wrote in sci.physics:
.... ahahahahaha.... AAHAHAHAHA...
.......ahahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHAHAHA...

"Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoortel #nospAm.hotmail.com
who used to call himself
"Dirk Vd M" dirkvandemoortel # ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com
but grew embarrassed of that over the years... ahahaha.. & now
* * * * * * * * * * * ---------- CONSPIRES with ------------
Lodo Ian Parker who wrote in message
The
other point is that people who have been posting against Relativity
have been doing do for some time. It is not as though they were
students questioning the foundations of Relativity, looking at the
evidence and then finding it to be the only possible theory. No the
structure of the postings indicate something a lot more
conspiratorial. Thre holy memes are in danger and need a boost.

*Dirk Vdm wrote:

Yes, sure. A good deal of the crackpots here are to try to
keep the meme alive, some in a more or less organized manner,
and some on their own. This is not new. I find it interesting.

hanson wrote:

The two conspirators are seen here in this pix:


http://media.urbandictionary.com/ima.../poo-28215.jpg


The fat one, Lodo Parker, is transmitting Relativity secrets
to the Spermless one, Moortel.... ahahahaha....
Thanks for the laughs, guys... hahahaha... ahahanson:


Hahahanson your style is getting so popular that important journalists
are trying to immitate you:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...handwellbeing2

Pentcho Valev

  #2  
Old September 2nd 08, 03:26 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
gb[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,501
Default Antirelativity - The true motive

The article states:

"Everyone thinks that Einstein was so smart. Let's examine this. What
was his big contribution? Everyone knows that: the theory of
relativity. This theory states that, when moving near the speed of
light, everything is related."

Actually everything is not related, there is a blackness of events.
The flare 30 thousand light years away in the core of our galaxy did
not happen to us until we see it. Light and time comes and tells us
what is happening. Relativity theory is that although the flare
happened 30 thousand years ago, for us it did not start approaching us
only a decade ago based on our sight of this event, and since nothing
can travel faster than the speed of light we won't see the flare reach
us for 30 thousand years. The flare is propagating with almost the
speed of light. Though the event happened 30 thousand years ago based
on light, it won't reach us for another 30 thousand years because we
won't ever see this flare move toward us faster than the speed of
light and currently we see it as it passed gas clouds 10 light years
from the core of the galaxy. Time and space is not directly related,
there is relativity, or contra to that a big blackness where time has
no direct connection but light. Things move relativistically as that.

Once seeing an explosion 30 thousand light years away, we can't
necessarily say the outer regions of the explosion are already much
closer to us. We see it exploding and the rate the outer perimeter of
the explosion arrives will never move faster than the speed of light
to us. What we see is what we get, not time coexistent, but as how
Einstein called it: relativistic, bound to the speed of light.


  #3  
Old September 2nd 08, 03:43 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique,sci.astro
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,934
Default Antirelativity - The true motive

..... ahahahahaha.... AAHAHAHAHA...
........ahahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHAHAHA...
ahahahaha... Too much! ... AHAHAHAHAHAH...

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
...

"hanson" wrote in sci.physics:

"Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoortel #nospAm.hotmail.com
who used to call himself
"Dirk Vd M" dirkvandemoortel # ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com
but grew embarrassed of that over the years... ahahaha.. & now
---------- CONSPIRES with ------------
Lodo Ian Parker who wrote in message
The
other point is that people who have been posting against Relativity
have been doing do for some time. It is not as though they were
students questioning the foundations of Relativity, looking at the
evidence and then finding it to be the only possible theory. No the
structure of the postings indicate something a lot more
conspiratorial. Thre holy memes are in danger and need a boost.

Dirk Vdm wrote:
Yes, sure. A good deal of the crackpots here are to try to
keep the meme alive, some in a more or less organized manner,
and some on their own. This is not new. I find it interesting.

hanson wrote:
These two conspirators are seen here in this pix:
http://media.urbandictionary.com/ima.../poo-28215.jpg
The fat one, Lodo Parker, is transmitting Relativity secrets
to the Spermless one, Moortel.... ahahahaha....
Thanks for the laughs, guys... hahahaha... ahahanson:

Pentcho Valev wrote:
Hahahanson your style is getting so popular that important
journalists are trying to immitate you:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandsty...handwellbeing2

hanson wrote:
ahahaha... AHHHH... this is balsam for my soul, Penchto.
Thanks. I think that this George Saunders dude from the
The Guardian,UK has the tune and gist of the zeitgeist
right in saying:

::S:: Einstein's mystique was his tendency to wander around
::S:: completely lost, hair sticking up, playing the violin.
::S:: Heisenberg tried this but was too small, well-organised
::S:: and balding, so ended up with neat hair, dragging his
::S:: violin behind him, sure where he was.
::S:: And hence Einstein is remembered as the greater genius.

ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... that revelation must be crushing
for the resident Einstein Dingleberries to hear... ahaha...

But Saunders still must polish the finer points in his historical,
seminal and critically acclaimed, internationally read
mainstream, peer reviewed, articles.
Said Saunders:

::S:: Einstein once explained relativity like this: "If you're sitting
::S:: on a hot stove for even a minute, it will seem like an eternity;
::S:: but if you're sitting on a hot stove with a pretty girl, your ass
::S:: will burst into flames and not a girl in the world will seem pretty.
::S:: Trust me, I've tried it."

See, right there in the last line he made his faux-pas. He should
have said, .. drum-roll... "Oye-weh" --- "Trust me!" -- "Go figure!"

ahahahaha... Thanks for the laughs, Pentcho... ahahahanson





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is it true? [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 May 15th 08 11:43 AM
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillati [email protected][_2_] Misc 8 November 9th 07 05:57 AM
over express her added motive Gregory[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 0 November 7th 07 04:56 AM
Is this true or not? Thomas Former Space Shuttle 17 June 16th 05 11:30 PM
Is this true ? skozzy Misc 5 April 16th 04 12:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.