A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

He's inaccurate on numbers, hubble photos



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 08, 11:45 AM posted to alt.music.rush,rec.aviation.military,alt.fan.adolf-hitler,sci.space.shuttle,alt.movies.spielberg
LIBERATOR[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default He's inaccurate on numbers, hubble photos

47 billion light years in radius is the whole universe, after that
nothing exists so you vaporize. Uh, no, the universe is more like
trillions of light years in radius. Then he inaccurately says only
500,000 stars exist in the Milky Way. Uh, it actually was over 500
billion and 1 trillion planets. So this guy is off, but I like his
convicting posture that life is everywhere on all planets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgg2t...eature=related

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Hubble - Holmes photos? jerry warner[_8_] Amateur Astronomy 0 November 14th 07 12:41 AM
Inaccurate weather forecasts Jonathan G UK Astronomy 12 January 8th 06 01:51 PM
Inaccurate starchart ? Sune Storgaard Amateur Astronomy 19 May 14th 05 11:42 PM
Are Hubble photos copyrighted? [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 6 February 6th 05 03:21 PM
Hubble photos of "deepest space" PURE BS! gravity jones Astronomy Misc 12 March 15th 04 01:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.